<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automating Twitter: Is It A Crime? [Poll]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Meakin</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-36521</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor Meakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-36521</guid>
		<description>I think it is OK in the case that you clearly articulate that you are automating.  People feel betrayed when they reach out and respond to something only to find out that the individual is offline and not &quot;listening.&quot; This can be a self-deflating thing IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is OK in the case that you clearly articulate that you are automating.  People feel betrayed when they reach out and respond to something only to find out that the individual is offline and not &#8220;listening.&#8221; This can be a self-deflating thing IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debhughes</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-36256</link>
		<dc:creator>Debhughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-36256</guid>
		<description>I attempted to follow Guy becausebof his reputation, but 26+ tweets in a day wasbtoo much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attempted to follow Guy becausebof his reputation, but 26+ tweets in a day wasbtoo much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrefbourqe</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-36251</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrefbourqe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-36251</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost a necessary evil for the effective marketer.  Because of it&#039;s sheer nature, and abundance of content, strategic placement of Twitter postings is critical to getting &quot;seen.&quot;  In managing this, automatic feeders are quite instrumental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost a necessary evil for the effective marketer.  Because of it&#8217;s sheer nature, and abundance of content, strategic placement of Twitter postings is critical to getting &#8220;seen.&#8221;  In managing this, automatic feeders are quite instrumental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kier Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-35709</link>
		<dc:creator>Kier Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-35709</guid>
		<description>I think that occasionally automated tweets etc are appropriate, especially if you have a lot of content to tweet about and you want to get the timing right so that you get the maximum audience. However, I think one of the advantages to Twitter is that is a real time application and that Tweeters are reacting to stories and events whilst they are happening. Automated tweets can spam your feed while there are more interesting relevant things to read about.

I am also not a fan of &#039;Thank you for following..&#039; etc because it is not personable,which again bypasses an advantage of Twitter and interacting with individual people rather than websites/brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that occasionally automated tweets etc are appropriate, especially if you have a lot of content to tweet about and you want to get the timing right so that you get the maximum audience. However, I think one of the advantages to Twitter is that is a real time application and that Tweeters are reacting to stories and events whilst they are happening. Automated tweets can spam your feed while there are more interesting relevant things to read about.</p>
<p>I am also not a fan of &#8216;Thank you for following..&#8217; etc because it is not personable,which again bypasses an advantage of Twitter and interacting with individual people rather than websites/brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-33703</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-33703</guid>
		<description>I have only just started using automation, mainly due to spending so much time on Twitter and Facebook that I haven&#039;t been getting much work done!  I only automate a few tweets a day, and then when I&#039;m around I tweet as normal... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only just started using automation, mainly due to spending so much time on Twitter and Facebook that I haven&#8217;t been getting much work done!  I only automate a few tweets a day, and then when I&#8217;m around I tweet as normal&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Pofcher</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-31249</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Pofcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-31249</guid>
		<description>I do not like autodms that say “Thanks for following me, I look forward to following your tweets.&quot;  I find the to be very disingenious.  In other words, you will send this out to everybody, with no regard to who they are.  So, Charles Manson (he could be on Twitter) would get the same response as me.  I find that no answer is better than a fake autodm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not like autodms that say “Thanks for following me, I look forward to following your tweets.&#8221;  I find the to be very disingenious.  In other words, you will send this out to everybody, with no regard to who they are.  So, Charles Manson (he could be on Twitter) would get the same response as me.  I find that no answer is better than a fake autodm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Pofcher</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-31250</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Pofcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-31250</guid>
		<description>I do not like autodms that say “Thanks for following me, I look forward to following your tweets.&quot;  I find the to be very disingenious.  In other words, you will send this out to everybody, with no regard to who they are.  So, Charles Manson (he could be on Twitter) would get the same response as me.  I find that no answer is better than a fake autodm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not like autodms that say “Thanks for following me, I look forward to following your tweets.&#8221;  I find the to be very disingenious.  In other words, you will send this out to everybody, with no regard to who they are.  So, Charles Manson (he could be on Twitter) would get the same response as me.  I find that no answer is better than a fake autodm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @JacekStr</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-28185</link>
		<dc:creator>@JacekStr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-28185</guid>
		<description>I thought I participate in a fresh subejct but it had almost a year. I know it was still actual, but repeating messages misleades readers - I like people who express themselves using Twitter and do not spam me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I participate in a fresh subejct but it had almost a year. I know it was still actual, but repeating messages misleades readers &#8211; I like people who express themselves using Twitter and do not spam me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jana rade</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-27710</link>
		<dc:creator>jana rade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-27710</guid>
		<description>I think it all depends. I use automated tweets sometimes when I&#039;m tweeting for a cause. Nobody can be online 24/7. I use Twaitter for some of my tweets I want repeated, whether it&#039;s helping a dog in need or important information I want everybody to notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it all depends. I use automated tweets sometimes when I&#8217;m tweeting for a cause. Nobody can be online 24/7. I use Twaitter for some of my tweets I want repeated, whether it&#8217;s helping a dog in need or important information I want everybody to notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Vickery</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbullas.com/2010/02/28/automating-twitter-is-it-a-crime-poll/#comment-27306</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vickery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffbullas.com/?p=3888#comment-27306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thankful that people automate their tweets.  If I miss one, I&#039;m liable to see it again soon as it gets re-scheduled.  Sure, there is some duplication, but I appreciate the information conveyed in a lot of those tweets and don&#039;t want to wade through hours of previous tweets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thankful that people automate their tweets.  If I miss one, I&#8217;m liable to see it again soon as it gets re-scheduled.  Sure, there is some duplication, but I appreciate the information conveyed in a lot of those tweets and don&#8217;t want to wade through hours of previous tweets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

