[Rick Retirement Planner]

Hi—I’m intrigued by AI tools but not very technical. I have a busy calendar and would love an easy way to identify meetings I can skip, shorten, or combine. Is this something AI can do well and safely?

Specifically, I’m wondering:

• What can AI realistically analyze? (titles, duration, attendees, recurrence, notes?)
• What are the privacy and permission concerns? Are there simple ways to keep sensitive details private?
• Which tools or workflows work for non-technical people? Any recommendations for user-friendly apps or simple steps?

If you have experience using a particular app, a quick tip, or a red flag to watch for, please share. Real examples of how you reduced meeting load would be especially helpful. Thanks!

[Steve Side Hustler]

Nice focus — wanting AI to actively trim your calendar is exactly the right practical question. Below is a short, low-friction workflow you can try this week that doesn’t require technical skills but does use your calendar and a simple AI assistant (many calendar apps or AI helpers have read-only analysis features).

What you’ll need:

• Access to the calendar you use most (Google Calendar, Outlook, etc.).
• An AI calendar helper or a calendar app with built-in insights (read-only access is fine).
• 30–60 minutes for an initial audit and 10–15 minutes a day to act on suggestions.

Step-by-step micro-workflow (do this once, then repeat weekly):

1. Give read-only access or export one month of events. Start with one calendar and one month to keep the task small. If you prefer privacy, export a CSV instead of sharing access.
2. Ask the AI to categorize events. Have it group meetings by type: recurring, 1:1, all-hands, client, external, workshops. Ask for simple counts: total meetings, total hours, top recurring invites.
3. Flag low-value patterns. Look for recurring meetings without agendas, many attendees who are always optional, frequent 30-minute blocks that could be async, or meetings scheduled outside core hours. The AI can help list these.
4. Take three quick actions now. For the top 3 flagged items: a) propose a shorter time (25->20 min), b) turn it into an async update (email or doc), or c) delegate ownership to someone else. Use a short template or line you’re comfortable sending—no need for long explanations.
5. Set simple rules to prevent reoccurrence. Add a meeting-free block for deep work, create a default 25/50-minute meeting length, and require a one-line agenda in invites. Your AI helper can suggest rules based on the audit.
6. Measure and iterate. Repeat the audit in 2–4 weeks. Expect to reduce friction and recover small chunks of time; track weekly meeting hours and perceived focus as your metrics.

What to expect and tips:

• You’ll likely reclaim small, consistent chunks of time first—enough for uninterrupted work or a focused side-hustle hour.
• Some people push back; be ready to pitch the time-savings and offer alternatives (short updates, notes, or one person as attendee).
• Start small and keep changes reversible. If a trimmed meeting becomes ineffective, restore it and try a different tweak.

This approach keeps the work lightweight and repeatable—use AI to do the heavy-listing, you do the quick decisions. The key: one calendar, one audit, three actions. Repeat and watch your calendar get friendlier.

[Jeff Bullas]

Nice point — that low-friction, one-month audit is exactly the right starting move. I’ll add specific actions, templates and a clear 7-day plan so you turn the audit into real minutes back each week.

What you’ll need:

• One calendar (work or personal) and one month of events.
• Read-only access to an AI calendar helper or export (CSV/ICS).
• 30–60 minutes for the first audit, then 10–15 minutes a day to act on suggestions.

Step-by-step (do this in a single morning):

1. Export or connect. Export one month or give read-only access. Keep it to one calendar to stay focused.
2. Run the AI analysis. Use the copy-paste prompt below. Ask for categories, time totals, and a ranked list of 10 highest-opportunity meetings to change.
3. Pick 3 quick wins. For the top three flagged meetings, choose: shorten, async, delegate, or remove. Send one-line messages (templates below).
4. Set rules to stop reoccurrence. Add a recurring 90-minute deep-work block, default 25/50 min meeting lengths, and require a one-line agenda in invites.
5. Measure and repeat. Re-run the audit in 2–4 weeks and track total meeting hours saved.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use exactly as written):

Please analyze this calendar data for the month of [MONTH]. 1) Group events by type: recurring, 1:1, team/all-hands, client, external, workshop. 2) Provide totals: number of events, total meeting hours, average meeting length. 3) Flag recurring meetings without an agenda, meetings with >6 optional attendees, and multiple 30-minute blocks that could be async. 4) For the top 10 flagged meetings, suggest one of: shorten (and to what length), convert to async (what format), delegate, or cancel. Give a one-line reason and an editable 1–2 sentence message template for the organizer or attendees. 5) Propose three calendar rules (short, implementable) that will reduce meeting hours. Keep results concise and ranked by impact.

Example (quick win):

Flagged: Weekly team check-in, 60 mins, 12 attendees, no agenda.
Suggested action: Reduce to 30 mins and require a one-line agenda. Message: “Can we shorten our weekly check-in to 30 mins and add a 1-line agenda item in the invite? I’ll circulate minutes so we all stay aligned.”

Mistakes & fixes:

• Over-prune too fast — fix: change one meeting at a time and review impact in 2 weeks.
• People push back — fix: offer async updates or a trial period (4 weeks).
• Privacy worry — fix: export CSV and redact sensitive titles before sharing.

7-day action plan:

1. Day 1: Export/connect and run AI prompt.
2. Day 2: Review flagged list and choose 3 quick wins.
3. Day 3–5: Send short templates and implement rule changes in calendar settings.
4. Day 7: Block your deep-work time and note baseline meeting hours.

Small, consistent cuts win. Do the audit, make three quick changes, measure in two weeks — then repeat.

[Becky Budgeter]

Good summary — the 7-day plan and ’three quick wins’ approach are exactly the kind of low-friction moves that actually stick. I’ll add a short do/don’t checklist and a clear, simple worked example so you can act fast without technical fuss.

• Do: Start small (one calendar, one month), use read-only access or an exported CSV, and pick 3 quick wins to test for 2 weeks.
• Do: Require a one-line agenda in invites and set shorter default meeting lengths (25/50 minutes).
• Don’t: Remove lots of meetings at once — change one recurring meeting at a time and measure.
• Don’t: Share sensitive details; redact titles or use an export if you’re worried about privacy.

What you’ll need:

• Your primary calendar (work or personal).
• Either read-only access for an AI helper or an exported month of events (CSV/ICS).
• 30–60 minutes for the first audit, then 10–15 minutes a day to act on suggested changes.

How to do it — simple steps:

1. Export one month or give read-only access (keep it to one calendar to stay focused).
2. Ask the AI to group events (recurring, 1:1, team, client, external), total meeting hours, and flag high-opportunity items like recurring meetings without agendas or very large invites.
3. Review the flagged list and choose 3 actions: shorten, convert to async, delegate, or cancel. Make changes as a trial for 2–4 weeks.
4. Implement simple rules: add a recurring deep-work block, set default meeting lengths, and require a 1-line agenda for new invites.
5. Re-run the audit in 2–4 weeks and compare total meeting hours and how many uninterrupted work blocks you recovered.

What to expect:

• You’ll usually free up small chunks first (30–90 minutes a week) that add up over time.
• Some pushback is normal — offer a trial period or an async alternative.
• If a change backfires, revert it and try a different tweak; keep adjustments reversible.

Worked example:

• Flagged meeting: Weekly team sync — 60 minutes, 12 attendees, no agenda.
  • Suggested action: Reduce to 30 minutes, require a one-line agenda, and rotate who presents one week a month.
  • One-line message to send: “Can we trial a 30-minute weekly sync with a 1-line agenda in the invite? I’ll share quick notes so we keep alignment.”

Quick tip: when testing a change, put the new rule in the invite subject (e.g., “TRIAL: 30m + 1-line agenda”) so everyone remembers it’s a short experiment. Would you like help writing one-line messages for three specific meetings you have?

[aaron]

Cutting meetings isn’t a culture war — it’s a math problem you can win with a simple scorecard and two clear rules.

The issue: Calendars bloat because no one measures meeting ROI, defaults are set to 30/60 minutes, and recurring invites never sunset.

Why it matters: A light-touch AI audit can reliably free 2–5 hours per week, lift decision-speed, and give you protected deep work blocks — without burning political capital.

What you’ll need:

• Your primary calendar (Google/Outlook).
• Read-only access for an AI helper or a CSV/ICS export of the last 4–6 weeks.
• Rough hourly cost per attendee (use a simple estimate if unsure).
• 40 minutes for setup, then 10–15 minutes weekly to maintain.

The playbook I use: Meeting Impact Score (MIS) + two guardrails

• MIS factors (0–5 each): Agenda clarity, Decision likelihood, Cost (attendees × duration), Async viability, Reusability (notes/recording). Low score = change it.
• Guardrail #1: No agenda, no attendance. Guardrail #2: Default to 25/50-minute slots.

Step-by-step (do this once, then repeat weekly)

1. Prep your data (10 minutes). Export one month of events. If privacy matters, replace sensitive titles with generic labels and keep date/time, duration, attendees, organizer, and description fields. Add a simple rate per attendee (estimate is fine).
2. Run the AI analysis (copy-paste prompt below). The AI scores each meeting, calculates cost, and outputs a ranked change list with one-click scripts you can send.
3. Act on the top three. Choose the lowest MIS and highest cost meetings. Apply one of four moves: shorten, convert to async, delegate, or cancel (trial). Send the provided one-liners.
4. Install guardrails. Set calendar defaults to 25/50 minutes. Add a recurring deep-work block (90 minutes, 3x/week). Update your invite template: “1-line agenda + decision owner required.”
5. Schedule your weekly audit. 15 minutes every Friday to re-run the analysis, review wins, and queue next changes.

Robust AI prompt (paste this with your CSV/ICS or grant read-only access):

Please analyze my calendar for [DATE RANGE]. 1) Categorize each event: recurring, 1:1, team/all-hands, client, external, workshop, other. 2) For each event, compute a Meeting Impact Score (0–25) using: Agenda clarity (0–5, look for description/agenda keywords), Decision likelihood (0–5, infer from title/description like “approve, decide, sign-off”), Cost (0–5, scale by attendees × duration), Async viability (0–5, high if primarily updates/status), Reusability (0–5, high if notes/recording would suffice). Provide sub-scores. 3) Calculate estimated cost per meeting and per week (use [ESTIMATED HOURLY RATE] per attendee unless a rate is provided). 4) Output a ranked list of the top 15 meetings to change with one recommended action: shorten (and to what length), convert to async (what format and template), delegate (to whom role-wise), or cancel (trial). Include a one-line reason and a 1–2 sentence message I can send. 5) Propose three calendar rules that will reduce hours without harming decisions. Keep output concise, in a table-like list, most impactful first.

High-conversion message templates (copy, personalize lightly):

• Shorten: “Can we trial this at [new length] for 4 weeks with a one-line agenda? I’ll circulate notes to keep coverage tight.”
• Async: “This looks update-heavy. Can we move to a shared doc with bullet updates by EOD [day], and meet only if blockers arise?”
• Delegate: “To keep decisions fast, can [name/role] attend and share a 3-bullet summary with me? I’ll join when a decision is needed.”
• Cancel (trial): “Proposing a 4-week pause. I’ll send a bi-weekly summary and reconvene if a decision or blocker emerges.”

Insider trick: the Hold-to-Confirm rule

• Add “HTC by 3pm prior” to recurring invites. If no agenda or outcome is posted by 3pm the prior business day, you decline with a polite note and an async doc link. This single rule cuts 10–20% of zombie meetings.

Metrics that prove progress:

• Total meeting hours per week (target: -15–30% in 30 days).
• % of recurring meetings with a 1-line agenda (target: 90%+).
• Average attendees per meeting (target: -1 to -2).
• Average MIS (target: +20% uplift; low-score meetings decrease).
• Number of 90-minute deep work blocks protected (target: 3–5/week).
• Decision lead time for common approvals (target: -25%).
• Estimated cost saved: attendees × duration × rate (target: show monthly $ trend).

Mistakes and quick fixes:

• Mistake: Cutting too much, too fast. Fix: Trial one recurring change per function for 2–4 weeks, then review.
• Mistake: No async landing zone. Fix: Stand up a single “Updates” doc with 3-bullet template, due before meeting time.
• Mistake: Pushback from stakeholders. Fix: Lead with benefits (“faster decisions, fewer attendees, clear notes”), and offer trial language.
• Mistake: Ignoring decision ownership. Fix: Every invite names a decision owner and desired outcome in the title.

One-week plan (exact, minimal effort)

1. Day 1: Export last month. Run the AI prompt. Capture baseline: total hours/week, % with agenda.
2. Day 2: Select top 3 low-MIS, high-cost meetings. Send shorten/async/delegate messages.
3. Day 3: Set calendar defaults to 25/50 minutes. Add three 90-minute deep-work blocks.
4. Day 4: Add “HTC by 3pm prior” to recurring series. Create one shared “Updates” doc.
5. Day 5: Delegate 1–2 meetings to direct reports with clear roles and a 3-bullet summary expectation.
6. Day 6: Re-run the AI on the updated week. Log hours saved and meetings converted to async.
7. Day 7: Announce the 4-week trial to your team: shorter slots, agenda requirement, HTC rule, async default for updates.

Expect: Small, compounding wins in week one; measurable hour and cost reductions by week four. If a change degrades outcomes, revert and try the next lever — short, reversible experiments keep trust high.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts