[Ian Investor]

I’m curious whether modern AI tools can generate practice exercises (math, language, logic puzzles, etc.) with clear, step-by-step solutions on demand for self-study. I’m not a tech person, just someone who wants helpful, printable practice sets to stay mentally active.

Specifically, I’d love feedback on:

• Effectiveness: Have you used AI to make accurate practice problems and detailed solutions?
• Prompts and templates: What simple prompts or formats worked best to get consistent, age-appropriate difficulty?
• Checking answers: How do you verify solutions and catch mistakes?
• Tools: Any user-friendly apps or settings that made the process easy?

If you’ve tried this, please share a short example prompt or a success/failure story. I’m looking for practical tips and reassurance that non-technical users can rely on AI for useful practice materials.

[Becky Budgeter]

Short answer: Yes — AI can generate on-demand practice sets with clear, step-by-step solutions, and you don’t need to be a tech expert to get useful results. Think of AI as a helpful assistant: you tell it the subject, the level, and the type of explanation you want, then review and refine what it creates.

Here’s a simple, practical way to get started:

1. What you’ll need
   • A device with internet access and an AI tool or chat interface (many are simple web forms).
   • A clear idea of subject, topic, and difficulty (for example: “algebra, linear equations, middle school”).
   • Sample problems or a target number of questions (5–15 is a good batch size to begin).
   • A spare 10–20 minutes for checking and tweaking the first set.
2. How to do it — step by step
   1. Open your chosen AI chat or worksheet tool.
   2. Give a short, clear request: state the topic, number of problems, desired difficulty, and ask explicitly for step-by-step solutions. Keep it conversational rather than technical.
   3. Ask for one format you can use (for example, “Problem — Solution steps — Final answer”). This keeps output consistent and easy to review.
   4. Review the first batch. Read each solution to make sure steps are logical and correct; AI can make simple mistakes.
   5. If a solution is unclear, ask the AI to re-explain a specific step or to show a different method. Iteration is normal and fast.
   6. When you’re happy, copy the set into a document or print it for practice. Repeat and vary parameters (more or fewer hints, different problem types) as needed.
3. What to expect
   • Good results quickly for many standard topics (math, grammar, basic science). Expect to do light checking—AI is helpful but not perfect.
   • Occasional errors in calculations or reasoning; always skim solutions before sharing with learners.
   • Easy customization: you can ask for multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, or worked solutions with extra hints for learners who need them.

Tip: Start with a small set (5 problems) and one clear format. It makes checking faster and teaches the AI your preferred style.

Would you like a quick example tailored to a specific subject and level (I can suggest how to phrase the request)?

[Steve Side Hustler]

Nice and practical — that tip about starting with a small set and a single consistent format is exactly what saves time. Once you teach the AI your preferred structure, iterating becomes fast and predictable.

• Do: Ask for a clear structure (Problem — Solution steps — Final answer) so you can skim quickly.
• Do: Start with 5 problems and set a 10–15 minute review window — rapid checking beats perfectionism.
• Do: Save one template you like and reuse it to keep results consistent.
• Don’t: Assume every step is correct; expect occasional arithmetic or reasoning slips.
• Don’t: Overload the first request — heavy customization slows you down. Add tweaks after the first pass.

Worked example — a quick 10-minute routine you can use today (fractions, basic level):

1. What you’ll need: a device with internet, your chosen chat tool, and a notebook or document to paste the results.
2. Step 1 (1 min): Tell the AI the topic, the number of problems (five), and that you want step-by-step solutions with one short hint per problem. Keep it conversational — no long scripts.
3. Step 2 (3–4 min): Skim the returned problems. If any look off-topic, ask for a replacement for that specific item. Small swaps are fast.
4. Step 3 (3–5 min): Spot-check three things: final answer correctness, a single intermediate step for logic, and whether the hint matches learner needs. If one solution is wrong, ask the AI to rework that problem and show the correction steps.
5. Step 4 (1–2 min): Copy the set into your document with a header that records the format and date. That becomes your reusable template for next time.

What to expect: you’ll get usable practice sets quickly and iterate to improve clarity. Expect to correct 0–2 mistakes in a five-problem set and to refine the hint style once or twice. Over time you’ll dial in a template so the AI produces cleaner first drafts.

Micro-idea to scale: keep a short “cheat row” in your document — a one-line preference (tone, hint length, step depth). Paste that before your quick request and you’ll get consistent sets without extra thinking.

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win — try this in under 5 minutes: paste the prompt below into any AI chat and ask for 5 basic fractions problems with step-by-step worked solutions. You’ll have a ready practice set in seconds.

Context: You already have the right approach — small batches, one format, quick review. That saves time and trains the AI to match your style.

What you’ll need

• A device with internet and an AI chat (any simple web chat will do).
• A clear topic, target level, and preferred format (Problem — Solution steps — Final answer).
• 10–15 minutes for the first review so you can trust the output.

Step-by-step (how to do it)

1. Open the AI chat and paste the prompt below (or your own variant).
2. Ask for 5 problems and the specific format: each item should include one short hint, a worked step-by-step solution, and a final answer line.
3. Skim: check final answers and one intermediate step per problem (3–5 minutes).
4. If anything looks off, tell the AI exactly which problem to rework and what you want clarified.
5. Save the set to your document and note the prompt as your template for next time.

Copy-paste prompt (use as-is)

“Create 5 basic fractions practice problems for a learner at basic level. For each problem, use this format: Problem — One short hint (1 sentence) — Step-by-step solution showing each step — Final answer. Keep steps clear enough for a non-expert to follow and include a one-line check that verifies the final answer. Use different problem types (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, simplifying).”

Example (one problem)

Problem: 3/4 + 2/5
br Hint: Find a common denominator.
br Solution steps: 1) Common denominator 20. 2) Convert: 3/4 = 15/20, 2/5 = 8/20. 3) Add: 15/20 + 8/20 = 23/20. 4) Convert to mixed number: 1 3/20. br Final answer: 1 3/20. br Check: 23/20 = 1.15, same as 1 3/20.

Mistakes & fixes

• Common errors: wrong common denominator, sign mistakes, or skipped simplification.
• Fix technique: ask the AI to “Show a quick verification step for each final answer” or to “Recompute with a different method.”
• If logic is fuzzy, ask for the same solution in plain language or with a diagram-style explanation.

Action plan — next 15 minutes

1. Run the prompt above and collect one 5-problem set.
2. Spend 10 minutes checking and tweaking language/hint length.
3. Save the prompt as your template and repeat weekly, changing topic or difficulty.

Reminder: AI speeds up creation — but your quick review keeps quality high. Try it now and save the prompt for tomorrow’s session.

— Jeff

[aaron]

Jeff’s quick win is right: small batches + one format + fast review = speed and control. Now let’s turn that into a repeatable system that delivers consistent quality, measurable progress, and less rework.

The issue: ad‑hoc prompts produce uneven problems and unclear steps. You waste time fixing avoidable errors.

Why this matters: a simple “practice set factory” gives you reliable output, traceable difficulty, and a clear audit trail. That’s how you scale beyond one good set.

What you’ll need

• An AI chat.
• A one-page checklist (format fields, difficulty scale, review criteria).
• A simple spreadsheet or document to log sets, errors, and learner results.

The playbook (do this in order)

1. Define the target: topic, sub-skills, level, and difficulty scale (1–5). Example (fractions): addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, simplifying.
2. Lock the format: every item must include Problem, Hint, Steps (numbered), Final Answer, Self‑check, Difficulty (1–5), Est. Time (sec), Skill tag, and a targeted misconception.
3. Generate with constraints using the prompt below. Require a coverage summary so you can verify distribution at a glance.
4. Audit separately: run an “auditor” prompt that recomputes each item, flags PASS/FAIL, and fixes only the failures. This keeps quality high without regenerating everything.
5. Calibrate difficulty: compare Est. Time vs. actual time a learner needs. Adjust difficulty scale rules in your prompt (+/− 1 level) next run.
6. Version and reuse: save “Form A” and auto-create a “Form B” variant (same skills, new numbers) for spaced practice.
7. Log outcomes: record accuracy, review time, and learner scores. Tune prompts based on what the data says.

Copy-paste prompt: Practice Set Generator (robust)

“Create 10 practice problems in [SUBJECT], focusing on [SKILL_TAGS], for a [LEVEL] learner. Mix problem types: [PROBLEM_TYPES]. For each item, output the following labels exactly, one per line:

ID: [1..10]Skill: [one of SKILL_TAGS]Problem: [clear, standalone prompt]Hint: [1 concise sentence]Steps: [numbered steps, show each arithmetic transformation clearly]Final Answer: [single value or expression]Self-check: [quick verification or substitution that confirms the result]Difficulty: [1–5]Est. Time (sec): [integer 20–120]Common Misconception: [specific error to watch for]

Constraints:- Steps must be 4–8 lines, readable by a non-expert.- Use friendly but non-trivial numbers; avoid repeating numbers across items.- Distribute skills roughly evenly and vary contexts.- No images; text only.

After the 10 items, add:Summary: coverage by Skill (%), average Difficulty, average Est. Time (sec).”

Optional quick auditor prompt

“Act as a solution auditor. For each item above: independently recompute; mark PASS or FAIL; if FAIL, provide Corrected Steps, Corrected Final Answer, and the Root Cause. Confirm that Self-check actually validates the result. Output only items that FAIL plus a 1-line summary of total PASS/FAIL.”

What to expect

• First run: 1–3 items may need fixes. The auditor prompt closes most gaps in under 3 minutes.
• After two iterations: accuracy ≥ 95% and review time ≈ 60–90 seconds per problem.
• Variant generation becomes one command (“Form B”), maintaining difficulty and coverage.

Metrics to track (weekly)

• Content accuracy after audit (%). Target: ≥ 95%.
• Average review time per problem (sec). Target: ≤ 90.
• Readability score (your judgment, 1–5). Target: ≥ 4.
• Distribution coverage by skill (%). Target: within ±10% of plan.
• Learner correct rate on Form A vs. Form B (%). Target: +10–20% on second exposure.
• Rework rate (items needing regeneration). Target: ≤ 10%.

Common mistakes and fast fixes

• Inconsistent format → Force labeled fields exactly; your prompt should state “labels exactly as written.”
• Woolly steps → Cap to 4–8 steps and require each arithmetic move on its own line.
• Drifting difficulty → Include Est. Time and recalibrate next run based on real timings.
• Weak self-checks → Demand a concrete verification (substitute back or recompute a different way).
• Overfitting to one pattern → Require varied contexts and rotate number ranges.

7‑day plan (light lift)

1. Day 1: Set your skills list, difficulty rules, and the fixed format (copy the labels above into a doc).
2. Day 2: Run the Generator for fractions (10 items). Log coverage and timing.
3. Day 3: Run the Auditor; fix fails only. Aim for ≥ 95% accuracy.
4. Day 4: Create Form B variants (same skills/difficulty, new numbers). Save both sets.
5. Day 5: Pilot with one learner; record time per problem and correct rate.
6. Day 6: Adjust difficulty rules and hint style based on data; regenerate 5 targeted items.
7. Day 7: Roll the template to a second topic (decimals or ratios) using the same system.

Insider tip: add “Common Misconception” per item. It forces the model to design for typical errors, which lifts learning value and reduces vague steps.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts