[Steve Side Hustler]

Hello — I’m refreshing my brand and wondering whether AI can actually help pick color palettes that perform well with customers. I’m not a designer or coder, so I’m looking for practical, non-technical advice.

My main question: Have you used AI tools to create brand color palettes that led to better engagement or conversions? I’d love short, real-world answers focused on what worked or didn’t.

• Which AI tools did you try (names welcome)?
• How did you test the palette’s effectiveness — simple A/B tests, customer surveys, or other methods?
• Any tips on prompts, checking accessibility/contrast, or common pitfalls to avoid?

Please share quick examples or results if you can. I’ll try suggestions and report back — thanks in advance for the help!

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win (under 5 minutes): Ask an AI for a 3-color palette and swap your primary CTA button to the new accent color. Track clicks for a week — you’ll likely see a measurable change fast.

AI can generate attractive, conversion-focused brand palettes — but it’s not magic. Think of AI as a smart assistant that speeds up color exploration and hypothesis creation. The real gains come from testing, accessibility checks, and consistent application across touchpoints.

What you’ll need

• Your current brand assets: logo, primary colors, audience description.
• An AI tool (ChatGPT or similar) or an AI color-generator.
• Analytics and a simple A/B or split-test method (even Google Analytics events or a basic split-by-traffic).
• Ability to change one CSS value on your site (CTA button color) or hand it to a developer.

Step-by-step: generate, apply, measure

1. Ask AI for 3 palettes tailored to your brand voice and audience. Save the hex codes.
2. Pick one palette and change the CTA button color only (the smallest meaningful change).
3. Run an A/B test: original vs new CTA. Measure CTR, conversion rate, and micro-conversions (form starts, add-to-cart).
4. Check accessibility: ensure contrast ratio is readable for all users.
5. If winners appear, scale the palette to other elements (headings, links, backgrounds) and re-test.

Example palette (AI-generated sample)

• Primary: #0057B7 (trustworthy blue)
• Accent: #FF6A00 (action orange — use for CTAs)
• Neutral: #F4F6F8 (soft background)

Sample CSS change (paste into your stylesheet):

button.cta { background-color: #FF6A00; color: #ffffff; }

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Changing too many things at once. Fix: Test one element (CTA color) first.
• Mistake: Choosing pretty colors that fail contrast/accessibility. Fix: Always check contrast ratios and try dark/light variants.
• Mistake: Trusting aesthetics over data. Fix: Use A/B tests and metrics, not gut alone.

Robust AI prompt (copy-paste)

“You are a branding designer. Generate 5 distinct 3-color brand palettes for an online course business selling to professionals aged 40–60. Each palette: give hex codes, a short label (e.g., ‘Trust & Action’), an explanation of the emotional tone, and recommended use for each color (primary, CTA, background). Also list contrast ratios for primary vs background and CTA vs background and suggest a lighter/darker variant for accessibility.”

Action plan (7 days)

1. Day 1: Generate 5 palettes with the AI prompt above. Pick one.
2. Day 2: Change CTA to new accent color and start A/B test.
3. Days 3–7: Monitor CTR and conversions. If +statistically meaningful lift, roll out gradually.

Remember: color influences behavior, but conversion lifts come from smart tests, clear messaging, and consistent execution. Use AI to speed up ideas — then let data decide.

[Rick Retirement Planner]

Good point — that quick win (swap one CTA color and measure) is the clearest, lowest-risk way to let AI help you. I’ll add a simple explanation of why focusing on one element works and a practical checklist plus a short worked example you can follow this week.

• Do: Test one visual change at a time (CTA color first).
• Do: Save hex codes and keep a short changelog so you can roll back.
• Do: Check contrast for readability and consider users with vision differences.
• Do: Measure meaningful metrics (CTR, conversion rate, micro-conversions).
• Don’t: Change copy, layout, and color all at once — that hides what drove the result.
• Don’t: Trust aesthetics alone — let data confirm behavior changes.
• Don’t: Ignore sample size — small swings can be noise.

What you’ll need

• Your current brand assets and the hex codes you’re using now.
• An AI tool or color generator to propose 2–5 palettes (you don’t need a fancy prompt; describe audience and tone).
• Basic analytics and a simple A/B test setup (even split traffic or Google Analytics events).
• Ability to change one CSS value (or pass the hex code to a developer).

How to do it (step-by-step)

1. Ask the AI for 3 candidate accent colors that match your brand voice (save hex codes).
2. Pick one and change only the primary CTA button color on a live A/B test: original vs new.
3. Run the test until you reach a sensible sample (rule of thumb: hundreds to low thousands of visitors per variant, depending on baseline conversion).
4. Compare CTR and conversion; check contrast and user feedback during the run.
5. If the new color wins with a consistent lift, roll it out to other UI elements gradually and re-test where needed.

Plain-English concept: small changes are powerful because they create a clear link between cause and effect. Changing one color isolates the variable, so if clicks rise, you can reasonably attribute the lift to that color choice rather than some other change.

Worked example

• Baseline: CTA color #0077CC, CTR = 5.0% over 7 days (10,000 visitors).
• Test: new accent #FF6A00 on equal traffic share (5,000 visitors each). New CTA CTR = 6.2%.
• Result: absolute lift = 1.2 percentage points (relative lift ≈ 24%). Check that the difference is consistent after a few days and with enough visitors — if it holds, rollout.

What to expect: often a measurable change within a week for high-traffic pages; for lower-traffic sites, expect longer tests. Keep changes small, document everything, and let the data guide the next move. Clarity builds confidence — one clear test at a time.

[aaron]

Nice call — testing one visual change is the lowest-risk path to a measurable lift. Here’s a compact, no-fluff plan to move from idea to result in a week.

Problem to solve

Many teams let aesthetics drive color choices. That looks nice but doesn’t guarantee more clicks or sales. You need one clear hypothesis, a controlled test, and the right KPIs.

Why this matters

Changing a single color (usually the primary CTA) isolates cause and effect. Small, isolated changes are cheap to implement and can produce outsized conversion gains quickly.

Quick lesson from experience

I’ve seen simple CTA color swaps produce 10–30% relative lifts on high-traffic pages. The trick is not the color — it’s the test design: one variable, real traffic, and clear metrics.

What you’ll need

• Current hex codes and a short changelog (so you can revert).
• An AI tool (ChatGPT or similar) or an AI color-generator.
• Analytics and an A/B split method (Google Optimize, GA events, or server-side split).
• Ability to change one CSS value (or hand hex to a developer).

Step-by-step (do this)

1. Ask AI for 3 candidate accent colors that match your brand voice. Save hex codes.
2. Pick one palette and change only the primary CTA button color on the live page. Example CSS to hand off: button.cta { background-color: #FF6A00; color: #ffffff; }
3. Run an A/B test: Original (control) vs New color (variant). Split traffic evenly.
4. Run until you hit a sensible sample: rule of thumb = hundreds to low thousands per variant depending on baseline conversion.
5. Evaluate and roll out only if the lift is consistent and practically significant.

Metrics to track

• Primary: CTR on CTA, conversion rate for the goal tied to CTA.
• Secondary: micro-conversions (add-to-cart, form starts), bounce rate, time on page.
• Operational: sample size, confidence interval / p-value, and effect size in absolute and relative terms.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Changing copy/layout and color together. Fix: Change one thing.
• Mistake: Ignoring accessibility. Fix: Check contrast ratios and provide dark/light variants.
• Mistake: Stopping too early. Fix: Wait for meaningful sample size and consistent trend.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

“You are a branding designer. Generate 5 distinct 3-color brand palettes for an online course business selling to professionals aged 40–60. For each palette: provide hex codes, a short label (e.g., ‘Trust & Action’), a one-sentence emotional tone, recommended use for each color (primary, CTA, background), and contrast ratios for CTA vs background. Suggest a light/dark variant for accessibility.”

7-day action plan

1. Day 1: Run the AI prompt, pick 1 palette, save hex and log it.
2. Day 2: Implement CTA color change and start A/B split.
3. Days 3–6: Monitor CTR, conversions, and sample size. Don’t change anything else.
4. Day 7: Analyze results — if lift is real, plan gradual rollout and accessibility checks.

Your move.

[Jeff Bullas]

Spot on — one visual change, one clear test. Let me add a couple of pro moves to make those color tests faster, safer, and more likely to produce a real lift.

High-value insight

• Grayscale test: Take a quick screenshot and convert it to grayscale. If your CTA still pops, you likely have enough luminance contrast — not just a pretty hue.
• Isolation radius: Give your CTA visual “breathing room.” Even the best color underperforms if crowded by similar accents nearby.
• Semantic tokens: Use CSS variables like –action-primary instead of hard-coding hex. You’ll swap colors in seconds without touching every button.
• Stress-test matrix: Check the CTA color on your top three backgrounds (light, dark, image overlay). Many losses come from one bad combo.

What you’ll need

• Your current palette (hex codes), key pages, and typical backgrounds.
• An AI tool to propose palettes and accessible variants.
• Basic A/B testing setup and the ability to edit one CSS rule.
• A simple contrast checker (aim for strong readability, especially on CTAs and text).

Step-by-step (build once, test forever)

1. Capture baseline: Note current CTR and conversion for the page. Screenshot the hero and product sections you’ll test.
2. Generate options with AI: Ask for 3–5 palettes tailored to your audience and tone, each with hex, contrast ratios, and light/dark variants.
3. Pre-filter for accessibility: Keep only options with strong contrast between CTA and background. Ask for a lighter/darker tweak if needed.
4. Run the grayscale and distance test: View the page from arm’s length (phone) or reduce zoom to 25% — can you still spot the CTA quickly?
5. Implement via tokens: Add variables once, then swap values per test. Example tokens to hand off: –action-primary, –action-hover, –text-on-action, –surface-1, –surface-2.
6. A/B the CTA only: Split traffic evenly. Set a guardrail: if the variant underperforms by a clear margin after a sensible sample, roll back.
7. Decide with data: Look at CTR and the next step (micro-conversions). A color that boosts clicks but hurts qualified leads is not a win.
8. Scale the winner: Extend the palette to links, badges, and banners, but test each step where the stakes are high (checkout, lead form).

Copy-paste AI prompt (robust)

“You are a senior brand/UI colorist. Propose 5 distinct 3-color palettes for a [describe brand, audience 40–60, tone]. For each palette provide: 1) hex and HSL, 2) roles: primary, CTA, background, 3) emotional rationale in one sentence, 4) contrast ratios for CTA vs background and primary text vs background, 5) a lighter and darker variant for the CTA that maintain accessibility, 6) a neutral gray (text/body) suggestion, 7) semantic CSS tokens to implement (e.g., –action-primary, –action-hover, –text-on-action, –surface-1). End with a one-paragraph guide: where to use each color, what to avoid (e.g., on images), and hover/focus recommendations.”

Prompt variants (use when needed)

• Locked brand primary: “Keep primary = [#HEX]. Generate only CTA and neutral colors that maximize contrast and salience on [#HEX] and on white. Include hover/focus states and contrast ratios.”
• Dark mode: “Create a dark-mode adaptation of Palette 3 with the same emotional tone. Ensure CTA meets contrast on #121212 and suggest an outline style for high-contrast environments.”
• Image-heavy pages: “Suggest a CTA color that remains distinct on busy photo backgrounds. Include a recommended solid ‘safety plate’ behind the button with 90–95% opacity for reliability.”

Example tokens and usage

• Tokens (hand to your developer): –brand-primary: #0057B7; –action-primary: #FF6A00; –action-hover: #E45F00; –text-on-action: #FFFFFF; –surface-1: #FFFFFF; –surface-2: #F4F6F8;
• Apply to CTA: button.cta { background: var(–action-primary); color: var(–text-on-action); } button.cta:hover { background: var(–action-hover); }
• Rule of thumb: keep one action color site-wide to train users where to click.

Real-world expectations

• High-traffic pages may show a measurable change within days; lower traffic takes longer. Stay the course until you have a sensible sample.
• Often, contrast and uniqueness outperform hue preference. A “boring” color that stands out cleanly can beat a fashionable one.
• Wins travel: a solid CTA color often lifts email buttons, ads, and pop-ups when rolled out consistently.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Testing during a promo: Discounts mask the color effect. Fix: Test during normal traffic.
• Busy image under the button: Text becomes hard to read. Fix: Add a solid/blurred safety plate or move the button to a clean area.
• Too many accent colors: Users don’t know where to look. Fix: One action color; use neutrals elsewhere.
• No negative guardrail: You bleed clicks. Fix: Predefine a stop-loss (e.g., end test if variant is ≥10% worse after N visits).

7-day action plan (simple and sturdy)

1. Day 1: Run the robust prompt. Pick 1–2 CTA candidates that pass contrast. Set tokens.
2. Day 2: Launch A/B on CTA only. Add guardrails. Document hex and time of change.
3. Days 3–5: Monitor CTR and the next-step metric (add-to-cart/form start). Don’t touch copy/layout.
4. Day 6: Grayscale-check on real pages; sanity-check mobile vs desktop. Adjust only if contrast is failing.
5. Day 7: Decide. If the lift is consistent and meaningful, roll out to emails and ads. If not, try your second candidate.

Closing thought: AI gives you great starting points; your job is to isolate, test, and keep what works. One clean change, measured well, beats a dozen guesses.

[aaron]

Hook: You don’t need prettier colors — you need a palette that isolates your CTA on every background, across devices, without hurting readability. AI gets you options fast. Data decides what stays.

Problem: Teams pick appealing palettes that collapse on real pages: busy images, dark-mode headers, weak hover states, and too many accents. Tests run during promos. Results lie.

Why it matters: CTA visibility drives action density. A color that stands out cleanly boosts qualified clicks, not just vanity taps. One controlled change can improve your funnel without rebranding.

Lesson from the field: Winners share three traits: high contrast against actual backgrounds (not just white), one action color site-wide, and zero visual competition within a 40–80px radius around CTAs. Hue is secondary; contrast and isolation win.

What you’ll need

• Current palette hex codes and screenshots of top pages (light, dark, image).
• An AI tool to generate palettes plus accessible variants.
• A/B testing capability and the ability to edit one CSS variable.
• A contrast checker and 15 minutes to run grayscale and distance tests.

Step-by-step (90-minute deployment)

1. Baseline: Record CTR on your primary CTA and downstream conversion for one page. Note traffic mix (mobile/desktop, new/returning).
2. Generate with AI: Produce 5 palettes tailored to your audience, each with hex/HSL, roles, contrast ratios, light/dark CTA variants, and semantic CSS tokens.
3. Pre-filter: Keep only options with strong CTA vs background contrast on your top three backgrounds (white, dark header, photo). Ask AI for a lighter/darker tweak when any combo fails.
4. Isolation check: Run the grayscale screenshot test and the arm’s-length zoom test (25%). If the CTA doesn’t pop instantly, discard.
5. Implement via tokens: Add variables once (e.g., –action-primary, –action-hover, –text-on-action, –surface-1, –surface-2). Wire buttons to tokens.
6. A/B one variable: Control = current CTA color. Variant = new CTA color only. Split 50/50. Add a stop-loss guardrail.
7. Run to signal: Aim for at least 300–400 CTA clicks per variant or 100+ conversions per variant (whichever comes first). Minimum full business cycle (7 days) to avoid novelty and weekday bias.
8. Decide and scale: Deploy only if lift is both consistent and meaningful. Roll out to emails/ads and hold-out a small control for a week to confirm the effect travels.

Metrics that matter

• Primary: CTA CTR, conversion rate for the next step (form start/add-to-cart), final goal CVR.
• Quality: Qualified lead rate or checkout completion rate post-click.
• Ops: Sample size per variant, relative lift (%), and a stop-loss threshold.
• Targets: Promote a color only if you see ≥10% relative CTR lift with no drop in downstream CVR. Stop-loss: roll back if the variant is ≥10% worse after a sensible sample.

Insider checks (fast wins)

• 1/3/9 rule: One action color site-wide. Max three action elements above-the-fold. No more than nine action elements on a page.
• Safety plate: For image heroes, add a subtle solid/blurred plate under the CTA at ~90–95% opacity. Consistency beats hue on photos.
• Color-blind resilience: Ensure the CTA is distinct in deuteranopia/protanopia simulations. If red/green clash, pivot to orange/blue or cyan/magenta contrasts.
• Hover/focus parity: Hover should increase perceived contrast (e.g., darker by 8–12%). Include a visible focus ring for keyboard users.

Robust AI prompt (copy-paste)

“You are a senior brand/UI colorist. Generate 5 distinct 3-color palettes for a [describe brand], audience 40–60, tone [e.g., trustworthy, energetic, premium]. For each palette, provide: 1) hex and HSL, 2) roles: primary, CTA, background, 3) 1-sentence emotional rationale, 4) contrast ratios for CTA vs background and primary text vs background across three contexts: white (#FFFFFF), dark header (#121212), photo background with 90% safety plate (#111111E6), 5) lighter and darker CTA variants that maintain accessibility, 6) a neutral gray for body text, 7) semantic CSS tokens (–brand-primary, –action-primary, –action-hover, –text-on-action, –surface-1, –surface-2), 8) a do/don’t usage note (where it fails, what to avoid). Return results as a concise list of palettes I can hand to a developer.”

Prompt variants

• Keep brand color, change action only: “Lock primary = [#HEX]. Propose 6 CTA options that maximize contrast on white, #121212, and image overlays. Include hover/focus states and pass/fail notes per background.”
• Dark mode first: “Adapt Palette [X] for dark mode. Ensure CTA meets contrast on #121212 and #0A0A0A, include outline alternative for high-contrast environments, and specify text-on-action color.”
• Secondary action system: “Design a secondary button style that is clearly subordinate (outline or muted fill) while maintaining accessibility. Provide tokens and spacing guidance to avoid competing with the primary CTA.”

Common mistakes & fixes

• Promotional noise: Testing during discounts skews results. Fix: Test during steady-state traffic.
• Accent overload: Multiple bright accents dilute salience. Fix: One action color; keep other accents neutral.
• Weak hover/focus: Users don’t get feedback. Fix: Increase contrast on interaction and add a visible focus ring.
• Device skew: Mobile wins, desktop loses (or vice versa). Fix: Review lifts by device; ship only if net positive and no critical segment declines.
• No rollback plan: Slow bleed if variant underperforms. Fix: Predefine stop-loss and revert on trigger.

1-week plan (timeboxed)

1. Day 1: Capture baselines and screenshots. Run the robust prompt. Shortlist 2 CTA candidates that pass all contrast contexts.
2. Day 2: Implement tokens and launch A/B with Candidate A vs Control. Document hex, time, and guardrails.
3. Days 3–4: Monitor CTR, micro-conversions, and device mix. Do not change copy/layout. Run grayscale/distance checks on live pages.
4. Day 5: Interim read: if Candidate A is ≥10% worse, stop and switch to Candidate B. Otherwise continue.
5. Day 6: QA dark mode, image heroes, and email templates using the same action color.
6. Day 7: Decide. If lift ≥10% with stable downstream CVR, roll out site-wide and into email/ads with a 10% holdout for confirmation.

Expectation set: Many “wins” come from contrast and isolation, not trendy hues. A clean, consistent action color often lifts across web, email, and ads when implemented via tokens and protected from visual clutter.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts