[Fiona Freelance Financier]

Hello — I’m a mid-career freelancer curious about whether simple AI tools can help me decide when to charge hourly versus a fixed project rate. I’m not technical and want a practical, low-effort approach.

My main question: can an AI-based pricing model help me compare trade-offs between hourly and project pricing and suggest sensible options based on a few basic inputs?

• What minimal inputs should I provide (e.g., estimated hours, complexity, client type)?
• Which beginner-friendly tools or templates work well (spreadsheets, no-code AI, simple prompts)?
• What realistic expectations and pitfalls should I watch for (accuracy, bias, data privacy)?

I’d love to hear quick examples, templates, or step-by-step starter ideas that a non-technical person can try. If you’ve used a tool or a simple spreadsheet + AI approach, please share what worked and what didn’t.

[aaron]

Good point — asking when to charge hourly versus project rates is exactly the right place to focus because pricing is where revenues and client experience collide.

The problem: freelancers often choose hourly or project pricing on intuition. That loses money when scope is clear and costs when uncertainty spikes.

Why it matters: the wrong model erodes margins, increases churn, and prevents scaling. AI can turn historical data and simple rules into consistent, defensible pricing choices.

Short lesson from experience: most freelancers win more by using a decision framework. Use hourly for low-clarity, high-variation work and fixed/project pricing for repeatable, well-scoped work — but let the data and risk-adjusted math decide.

• Do: Track time, collect scope checklists, record variations and change requests.
• Do not: Rely on gut feeling for complex, multi-stage projects.

Step-by-step (what you’ll need, how to do it, what to expect):

1. Gather inputs — last 12 projects: billed type (hour/project), estimated vs actual time, client type, deliverables, change requests, final profit.
2. Create rules — define threshold values (e.g., if scope variance > 20% or unknown tech > 1, prefer hourly).
3. Use AI to predict — feed project description and historical data to an AI model to get: likely hours ± variance and a risk score.
4. Simulate pricing — calculate expected margin for hourly vs fixed (use predicted median hours plus buffer for fixed price).
5. Decide and document — pick the model that meets your margin target and client expectations; attach contract terms and change-order triggers.

Metrics to track:

• Average margin by pricing model
• Estimate error (actual hours / estimated hours)
• Win rate by proposal type
• Client satisfaction / repeat rate

Common mistakes & fixes:

• Underpricing fixed bids — add a contingency (10–30%) based on variance.
• No scope guardrails — fix with milestone payments and written change-order fees.
• Using AI blindly — always validate AI output against 2-3 past projects.

One-week action plan (practical):

1. Day 1: Export 6–12 project records and time logs.
2. Day 2: Fill a simple spreadsheet with estimate vs actual, scope clarity, client type.
3. Day 3: Run the AI prompt below for 3 recent proposals.
4. Day 4: Review AI recommendations, pick model for each, set margin targets.
5. Day 5–7: Price 3 live proposals with chosen models, track results.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is):

“You are an expert freelance business analyst. I will give you: a short project description, my historical project dataset summary (average hours, variance, frequency of change orders), and my target margin. Predict the most likely hours (median and 75th percentile), give a risk score from 1–10, and recommend hourly or fixed pricing with calculation: recommended price = (hours at 75th percentile * my hourly rate) + contingency. Explain assumptions in one paragraph.”

Worked example (quick): A website redesign: historical median 40 hours, 75th percentile 55 hours, high change-order rate. AI predicts 50h (75th 65h), risk 7/10 → hourly or fixed with 25% contingency. If your hourly rate is $100, fixed price = 65*$100*1.25 = $8,125 (or propose hourly with a cap).

Your move.

[Becky Budgeter]

Nice concise framework — I like the focus on using data plus rules instead of gut instinct. That switch alone makes pricing less emotional and more repeatable.

Here’s a practical addition you can use right away: a simple decision checklist, a short calculation method, and what to expect when you introduce AI into the loop.

1. What you’ll need
   • 6–12 past projects: billed type, estimated vs actual hours, number of change requests, final profit.
   • Your standard hourly rate and a target margin (e.g., 30%).
   • A spreadsheet and an AI tool (or just use the spreadsheet first).
2. How to do it — quick steps
   1. Make three columns in the sheet: estimate, actual, % variance (actual/estimate – 1).
   2. Calculate median hours and the 75th-percentile hours from those projects. Note how often variance >20% and how often change requests occurred.
   3. Apply a rule: if variance rate > 30% or change-order frequency > 30%, default to hourly. If variance < 20% and repeatable work, prefer fixed with contingency.
   4. For fixed bids, price using the 75th-percentile hours × hourly rate × contingency (10–30% based on variance). For hourly, consider a time cap or retainer for client comfort.
   5. Use AI to sanity-check: give the AI a short project description plus the summary stats (median, 75th, change-order rate) and ask for a predicted hours range and a risk score — then compare AI’s numbers with your spreadsheet before trusting them.
3. What to expect
   • Week 1: clean data and get median/75th numbers. You’ll already see whether projects typically overrun.
   • Week 2–4: test the rule on 3–5 proposals. Expect some rejections — that’s normal while you align price with value.
   • After 2 months: you’ll have real win-rate and margin differences to refine your contingency and the hourly-vs-fixed thresholds.

Two small contract tips: always include a clear change-order process (written scope add-ons and price/time impacts) and offer a hybrid option (fixed scope with hourly for out-of-scope items, or fixed with a soft cap and an hourly true-up).

Quick question to tailor this: do you already track time and change requests, or would you be starting from scratch?

[Jeff Bullas]

Nice—your checklist is exactly the kind of practical move that turns pricing from guesswork into repeatable process.

Here’s a compact, action-first addition you can use immediately: a do / do-not checklist, exact spreadsheet formulas, a simple hybrid contract language option, a worked example, and an improved AI prompt to paste and run.

• Do: Track estimates, actuals, change-requests and final margin for 6–12 projects.
• Do: Use median and 75th-percentile to set fixed bids and contingencies.
• Do not: Bid fixed without a contingency or a written change-order process.
• Do not: Blindly accept the AI output—use it to sanity-check your numbers.

What you’ll need

• Spreadsheet (Google Sheets or Excel).
• 6–12 past projects with estimated and actual hours.
• Your hourly rate and a target margin (e.g., 30%).
• An AI tool (optional) for predictions and risk scores.

1. Clean data — put actual hours in a column (e.g., B2:B13).
2. Calculate stats — use: MEDIAN(B2:B13) and PERCENTILE(B2:B13,0.75).
3. Decide rule — example: if % of projects with variance >20% >30% OR change-order frequency >30% → prefer hourly.
4. Price fixed bids — fixed = 75th_percentile_hours × hourly_rate × (1 + contingency%). Choose 10%–30% based on variance.
5. Offer hybrid — fixed price for scope A + included hours (e.g., 10h). Out-of-scope billed hourly or true-up at completion.

Worked example

Website redesign: median 40h, 75th 55h, change-order rate high. Hourly rate $100. Fixed bid = 55 × $100 × 1.25 (25% contingency) = $6,875. Alternative: propose fixed $5,500 for core scope (50h included) + hourly $120 for out-of-scope work with a soft cap and mid-project review.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Underestimating contingency — fix: base contingency on observed variance, not a guess.
• No scope guardrails — fix: milestone sign-offs and written change-order fees.
• Trusting AI blindly — fix: validate AI predictions against 2–3 similar past projects.

One-week action plan

1. Day 1: Export project times and change-request notes into a sheet.
2. Day 2: Calculate median and 75th percentile; note variance rate.
3. Day 3: Run the AI prompt below for 3 active proposals.
4. Day 4–7: Price 3 proposals using your rules, track client feedback and outcomes.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

“You are an expert freelance business analyst. I will give you: a one-paragraph project description, my historical summary (median hours, 75th-percentile hours, % of projects with >20% variance, change-order frequency), and my hourly rate and target margin. Predict the most likely hours (median and 75th percentile), give a risk score 1–10, and recommend hourly, fixed, or hybrid with a short pricing calculation and one-sentence explanation of assumptions.”

Quick question to tailor this: do you already track time and change requests, or are you starting from scratch?

Small reminder: start simple — the first three priced proposals are your learning lab. Refine rules from real outcomes, not theory.

[Rick Retirement Planner]

Nice point — your concise checklist is exactly the kind of clarity freelancers need. Clarity builds confidence: when you can explain the numbers and the decision rule to a client, you reduce negotiation friction and protect your time.

• Do: Track estimates, actuals, change-requests and final margin for at least 6–12 projects.
• Do: Use median and 75th-percentile hours to set fixed-bid baselines and contingency levels.
• Do not: Offer fixed price with no contingency or no written change-order process.
• Do not: Treat AI output as gospel — use it to sanity-check your spreadsheet and two similar past projects.

1. What you’ll need
   • Spreadsheet (Excel or Google Sheets).
   • 6–12 project records: estimate, actual hours, count of change requests, final profit.
   • Your standard hourly rate and a target margin (for example, 30%).
   • An AI tool (optional) to give a predicted-hours range and a risk score.
2. How to do it — step by step
   1. Clean the data: one row per project with estimated and actual hours, plus a flag for change requests.
   2. Calculate stats: median hours and 75th-percentile hours (spreadsheet functions like MEDIAN and PERCENTILE work fine).
   3. Measure variance rate: percent of projects where actual/estimate > 1.20 and change-order frequency.
   4. Set a rule: for example, if variance rate > 30% or change-order frequency > 30% → prefer hourly; otherwise consider fixed with contingency.
   5. Price the options: fixed = 75th_percentile_hours × hourly_rate × (1 + contingency%). For hourly, offer a time cap, retainer, or milestone billing so clients feel safe.
   6. Document terms: include a short change-order clause (scope add-on = hourly rate × estimated hours for change + brief approval step) and a mid-project review point.
3. How to use AI (safely)
   • Tell the AI the project summary and your summary stats (median, 75th, variance rate, change-order rate) and ask for a likely-hours range and a risk score. Then compare AI numbers to your spreadsheet before deciding.

What to expect: first week you’ll get clean stats; weeks 2–4 you’ll test the rule on a few live proposals and expect some client pushback as you adjust pricing. Within two months you’ll have win-rate and margin signals to refine contingency and thresholds.

Worked example: Website redesign — historical median 40h, 75th 55h, high change-order rate. Your hourly = $100. If you choose fixed with a 25% contingency: fixed = 55 × $100 × 1.25 = $6,875. Alternative hybrid: charge $5,500 for the core scope (roughly 50 included hours) + $120/hr for out-of-scope work with a mid-project review and a soft cap to keep the client comfortable.

Small practical tip: when you explain the math to a client (showing the hours band and the contingency) they usually accept the structure — not because they love the price, but because they understand the risks and the process.

[aaron]

Quick win (under 5 minutes): Score your next proposal with this 7-question card. Give 1 point for each “yes.” If total ≥ 5 → default to hourly or hybrid; ≤ 3 → fixed price; 4 → hybrid.

• Is the scope still evolving?
• Are there 3+ stakeholders or approvers?
• Are there dependencies you don’t control (third parties, data access)?
• Is there unfamiliar tech or tools?
• Is the deadline rigid with penalties or launch pressure?
• Are “unlimited revisions” or creative/strategy components expected?
• Has this client changed scope on you before (or lacks a brief)?

The problem: Freelancers choose hourly vs project pricing by feel, not facts. That creates margin swings, scope creep, and awkward renegotiations.

Why it matters: A consistent rule reduces discounting, raises win rate, and keeps your calendar and cash predictable.

Lesson from the field: Use a risk score + historical hours. Price three ways every time (Hourly Safe, Fixed Value, Hybrid Guardrails). Let the numbers decide, not the mood.

1. Build your decision system
   1. Calculate two anchors from past projects: Median hours (P50) and 75th-percentile hours (P75).
   2. Use the 7-question risk card above. Score 0–7.
   3. Map decision: 0–3 = Fixed; 4 = Hybrid; 5–7 = Hourly or Hybrid.
2. Set prices with simple formulas
   1. Fixed = P75 × Hourly Rate × (1 + Contingency%). Contingency% by risk: 0–1 = 10%, 2–3 = 20%, 4 = 30%.
   2. Hourly (with client comfort) = Hourly Rate, estimate P50–P75 range, add a soft cap at 1.2× P50, weekly reporting, change-order process.
   3. Hybrid = Fixed for clearly defined core scope (e.g., P50 hours), includes X revisions + Y included hours; out-of-scope at Hourly Rate with approval after Z hours.
   4. Optional discovery (high risk): sell a small paid discovery (5–10 hours) to de-risk, then reprice with clarity.
3. Spreadsheet setup (copy/paste)
   1. MEDIAN of actual hours: MEDIAN(B2:B13)
   2. 75th-percentile hours: PERCENTILE(B2:B13,0.75)
   3. Variance% each row: =(Actual/Estimate)-1; flag overruns >20%.
   4. Fixed price cell: =P75 * HourlyRate * (1+Contingency%)
   5. Hourly soft cap: =P50 * 1.2
4. Use AI as your second opinion (not your boss)

   Copy-paste AI prompt:

   “You are my pricing analyst. I’ll give you: 1) a short project description, 2) my historical stats (P50 hours, P75 hours, % of past projects with >20% overrun, change-order frequency), 3) my hourly rate and target margin, 4) answers (Yes/No) to these risk questions: evolving scope, 3+ stakeholders, external dependencies, unfamiliar tech, rigid deadline, creative/revisions-heavy, client prone to scope change. Do the following:
   – Estimate hours at P50, P75, P90 and explain the drivers in plain English.
   – Produce a risk score 0–7 from the Yes answers.
   – Recommend one model (Hourly, Fixed, Hybrid) and explain why in one paragraph.
   – Price three options:
   A) Hourly Safe: hourly rate + estimated range + soft cap at 1.2× P50, weekly reporting.
   B) Fixed Value: price = P75 × rate × contingency (10–30% based on risk). State included deliverables and revisions.
   C) Hybrid Guardrails: fixed price for core scope with X included hours + overage at hourly rate after approval at Y hours.
   – Provide 3 short contract clauses: change-order process, revision limits, mid-project review. Keep output to bullet points I can paste into a proposal.”

   What to expect: clear hours band (P50/P75/P90), a reasoned risk score, and three concise price structures you can paste into a proposal. Validate against two similar past projects before sending.

5. Proposal language (paste-ready)
   • Change orders: “Out-of-scope items are quoted in writing and approved before work. Pricing = hourly rate × estimated hours for the change.”
   • Revisions: “Includes two revision rounds. Additional revisions billed hourly with prior approval.”
   • Midpoint review: “At 50% of estimated hours, we review progress and confirm scope. Adjustments require a signed change order.”

Metrics to track (weekly dashboard):

• Margin by model (Fixed vs Hourly vs Hybrid).
• Estimate accuracy: Actual Hours ÷ Estimated P50 and vs P75.
• Overruns: % of projects exceeding P75 hours.
• Change-order revenue % of total (healthy: 10–25% on complex work).
• Proposal win rate by model and by option (A/B/C).
• Average negotiation cycles per proposal (aim to reduce by explaining the rule upfront).

Common mistakes & fixes:

• Mistake: Quoting one option. Fix: Always show Hourly, Fixed, Hybrid to anchor value and let clients choose risk.
• Mistake: Flat 10% contingency for everything. Fix: Tie contingency to the risk score.
• Mistake: Unlimited revisions in fixed bids. Fix: Define rounds; move extras to hourly via change order.
• Mistake: Ignoring discovery. Fix: Sell a paid discovery when risk ≥ 5; reprice after.
• Mistake: Trusting AI blindly. Fix: Cross-check with at least two similar projects and your P75.

One-week action plan:

1. Day 1: Pull 6–12 past projects; calculate P50, P75, and % overrun >20%.
2. Day 2: Add the 7-question risk card to your proposal template; set contingency by risk.
3. Day 3: Run the AI prompt on 3 active opportunities; produce A/B/C pricing options.
4. Day 4: Insert the three proposal clauses; add a midpoint review to every contract.
5. Day 5–6: Present proposals; track client preference (Hourly vs Fixed vs Hybrid), objections, and win/lose.
6. Day 7: Review metrics; adjust contingency bands or thresholds if P75 is consistently off.

Target outcomes in 30 days: +5–10 margin points on fixed bids, 25–40% fewer overruns beyond P75, and a faster yes/no from clients thanks to clearer options.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts