[Steve Side Hustler]

Hello — I have a few research ideas and I’m wondering whether AI tools can help me find suitable datasets to test specific hypotheses. I’m not a data scientist, so I’d appreciate practical, non-technical advice.

Specifically, I’d like to know:

• What information should I give an AI (topic, hypothesis, formats, size, timeframe, license)?
• Can AI suggest trustworthy sources like public repositories or archives (for example Google Dataset Search, Kaggle, UCI)?
• What are the limits and risks — data quality, bias, licensing or privacy concerns?
• Any simple prompts or beginner tools I could try right away?

If you’ve used AI or a specific site to locate datasets, could you share a short example prompt and where it pointed you? Practical, step-by-step tips and friendly cautions are most welcome. Thanks!

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win (under 5 minutes): Tell an AI your hypothesis and ask for 5 ready-made dataset sources and one precise web search query you can paste into Google. You’ll have a shortlist before your coffee is cold.

Context: Finding the right dataset is often the hardest part of testing a hypothesis. AI can act like a smart research assistant — suggesting data sources, creating search queries, assessing suitability, and even outlining a simple cleaning checklist.

What you’ll need

• A concise hypothesis (one sentence).
• Key variables you need (3–6 items).
• Constraints: file types (CSV/JSON), minimum rows, privacy/licensing limits.
• Access to a web browser or an AI chat tool (chatbot or local model).

Step-by-step: Use AI to find datasets

1. Write your one-sentence hypothesis and list 3–6 variables. Keep it short.
2. Copy the AI prompt below and paste it into your AI chat box. Ask for dataset sources, search queries, and a quick eval of fitness.
3. Get the output: examine suggested sources (e.g., Kaggle, UCI, government portals), the sample search queries, and the prioritised list of candidates.
4. Open the top 1–2 suggested sources and download sample files. Check column names and row counts against your needs.
5. If needed, ask the AI to create a short cleaning checklist and a sample filter (e.g., remove nulls, convert dates, normalize categories).

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

“I have this hypothesis: [insert one-sentence hypothesis]. Key variables I need are: [var1, var2, var3]. My constraints: file type CSV, minimum 5,000 rows, no personal data. Suggest 5 specific datasets (name and likely source), give one precise web search query I can paste into Google for each dataset, rate each dataset for fit (1-5) and list any likely licensing or privacy issues. Also give a 3-step cleaning checklist for the top dataset.”

Example output you can expect

• Five dataset suggestions with sources (Kaggle, UCI, government portal). Fit scores and quick reasons.
• Search queries like: sales data “retail transactions” CSV site:kaggle.com
• Cleaning checklist: remove nulls from X, convert date to ISO, standardize category names.

Mistakes & fixes

• Too-broad hypothesis — Fix: narrow to one measurable outcome and list exact variables.
• Ignoring license — Fix: ask AI to flag CC0/public domain vs. restricted licenses before download.
• Assuming data is clean — Fix: always inspect headers, null rates, and sample rows before analysis.

Action plan (next 24–72 hours)

1. Run the prompt now to get 5 candidates.
2. Download the top candidate and run the 3-step cleaning checklist.
3. Run a quick two-chart check (histogram and a scatter) to see if the data supports your hypothesis.

Reminder: Start small, validate fast, then iterate. The AI gets you to the door — you still need to look inside the dataset. Ask for clarification whenever a result seems off.

[Rick Retirement Planner]

Short version: Yes — an AI can speed you to candidate datasets by matching your one-sentence hypothesis, the exact variables you need, and a few practical constraints. Think of the AI as a smart librarian: it prioritises likely sources, suggests precise search phrases you can paste into a search engine, and flags obvious licensing or privacy concerns so you don’t waste time.

One concept in plain English: A “fit score” is just the AI’s quick guess of how well a dataset will help test your hypothesis — it looks at whether the dataset contains your requested variables, has enough rows, and meets your file and privacy constraints. It’s not definitive; it’s a starting filter that saves you the first look-over.

What you’ll need

• A single, one-sentence hypothesis (clear outcome + predictor).
• 3–6 exact variable names or descriptions (e.g., purchase_date, age_group, zipcode).
• Constraints: preferred file type, minimum rows, and any privacy/license limits.
• A browser or chat with an AI (cloud or local) and 10–20 minutes to review results.

Step-by-step: how to use AI to find datasets

1. Write the one-sentence hypothesis and list the variables. Keep both compact.
2. Ask the AI in plain language to suggest 4–6 candidate datasets, one ready search query per candidate, a simple fit rating (1–5), and any license/privacy notes. Ask for a 2–3 step cleaning checklist for the top candidate.
3. Review the AI’s list and paste the suggested search queries into your browser to find the datasets.
4. Download sample files from the top 1–2 sources and check header names, row count, and obvious null rates.
5. Run the brief cleaning checklist the AI gave, then do a quick two-chart check (histogram for distribution and a scatter or cross-tab for the relationship you care about).
6. If the top candidate fails, iterate: narrow variables, relax or tighten constraints, and ask the AI for another pass.

Prompt style variants (keep conversational)

• Starter: Briefly describe your hypothesis and the 3 variables you need — ask for 5 dataset suggestions, one search phrase each, and a short fit note.
• Detailed: Add constraints (file type, min rows, no personal data) and ask for a 3-step cleaning checklist for the best match.
• Advanced: Ask the AI to rate each candidate for data freshness, likely columns to expect, and any licensing restrictions to watch for.

What to expect and common fixes

• Expect a shortlist (Kaggle, gov portals, UCI, academic repos) and search phrases you can reuse. AI can miss niche repositories; follow up when it does.
• If results are too broad, narrow your hypothesis or list exact column names you consider essential.
• If licensing is unclear, don’t download or use the data until you verify the license on the hosting site.

Quick action plan (next 24–72 hours)

1. Run a conversational request with one variant above to get 4–6 candidates.
2. Download the top candidate, run the 3-step cleaning checklist, and inspect a sample of rows.
3. Create one simple chart to check whether the data can sensibly test your hypothesis; iterate if needed.

[Jeff Bullas]

Hook: Yes — AI can get you from idea to usable dataset fast. Think of it as a smart librarian that hands you five promising books and the exact search phrase to find each one.

Quick context: The hardest bit of testing a hypothesis is often finding the right data. AI speeds the search, suggests likely sources, writes precise search queries, and flags obvious license/privacy issues so you waste less time.

Do / Don’t checklist

• Do give a one-line hypothesis and list 3–6 exact variables.
• Do state file format, min rows, and privacy/license limits up front.
• Do use the AI’s search queries in your browser — verify the license before downloading.
• Don’t assume the AI’s fit score is perfect — it’s a starting filter.
• Don’t skip a quick sample check of headers, nulls and row count.

What you’ll need

• A single-sentence hypothesis (outcome + predictor).
• 3–6 variables (exact names or clear descriptions).
• Constraints: CSV/JSON, minimum rows, no personal data, etc.
• 10–30 minutes and a browser or AI chat tool.

Step-by-step: practical shortcut

1. Write your one-line hypothesis and the variables needed.
2. Paste the copy-paste prompt below into your AI chat and run it.
3. Review the 4–6 candidate datasets, their one-line fit reasons, and the provided search queries.
4. Click or paste the search query into your browser, inspect the top sources (Kaggle, gov portals, UCI, academic repos).
5. Download a sample file, check headers, row count, null rates. Ask the AI for a 2–3 step cleaning checklist and apply it.
6. Make one quick chart (histogram or scatter) to see if the data can test your hypothesis. Iterate if needed.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

“I have this hypothesis: [insert one-sentence hypothesis]. Key variables I need are: [var1, var2, var3]. My constraints: preferred file type CSV, minimum 5,000 rows, no personal data, and public domain or CC0 license only. Suggest 5 specific datasets (name, likely source), give one precise web search query I can paste into Google for each dataset, rate each for fit (1-5) with a one-line reason, and list any likely licensing/privacy issues. For the top dataset provide a 3-step cleaning checklist.”

Worked example

• Hypothesis: “Email send frequency increases click-through rate.” Variables: send_date, recipient_age_group, emails_sent_last_30d, click_through_rate. Constraints: CSV, >=10,000 rows, no PII.
• Expected AI output: 5 dataset names (e.g., marketing event logs on Kaggle; anonymised transactional datasets from academic repos), 1 search query per dataset (copyable), fit scores, and a 3-step cleaning checklist (remove PII columns, convert send_date to ISO, aggregate by recipient_age_group).

Mistakes & fixes

• Too-broad hypothesis — Fix: narrow to one outcome and one main predictor.
• Ignoring license — Fix: confirm license on the host site before use.
• Assuming clean data — Fix: always sample rows and run the cleaning checklist before analysis.

Action plan (next 24–72 hours)

1. Run the prompt now with your hypothesis.
2. Download the top candidate and run the 3-step cleaning checklist.
3. Create one quick chart to validate whether the data can test your hypothesis.

Reminder: start small, validate fast, then iterate. The AI opens the door — you still need to step inside and check the furniture.

[aaron]

Right call-out: Your “smart librarian” framing is spot on. Let’s turn that librarian into an acquisitions manager: fast shortlist, license-checked, and ready to test in under 60 minutes.

Why this matters: Finding data isn’t the win. Reducing time-to-first-test and avoiding unusable datasets is. Treat the search like a funnel with hard gates so you stop sifting and start validating.

Field lesson: Teams stall because they search by dataset names, not by variable evidence. The fix is to have AI generate a variable synonym map and exclusion terms first, then build precise search queries and a scoring sheet. This trims the hunt by half.

What you’ll need

• One-sentence hypothesis tied to a decision (e.g., “If X, we will do Y”).
• Must-have variables (3–5) and nice-to-have variables (2–3).
• Constraints: file type (CSV/Parquet), minimum rows, date range, no PII, license (CC0/public domain).
• 20–60 minutes, a browser, and an AI chat.

Insider trick (do this first): Ask AI to build a variable synonym map and negative filters before you search. Example: “revenue” can appear as sales, turnover, GMV; exclude image, NLP, or synthetic data if irrelevant. This doubles the precision of your queries.

Copy-paste AI prompt: Query Builder + Shortlist (use as-is)

“Hypothesis: [one sentence]. Decision this informs: [e.g., increase budget, change pricing]. Must-have variables: [list 3–5]. Nice-to-have variables: [list 2–3]. Constraints: file type [CSV/Parquet], minimum rows [N], time range [e.g., 2019–2024], license [public domain/CC0], no personal data. Geography: [country/region]. Build: 1) a synonym map for each variable (3–6 alternatives each), 2) a list of negative filters to exclude irrelevant datasets, 3) six precise web search queries using quotes and operators (e.g., filetype:csv site:.gov OR site:kaggle.com), 4) a ranked list of 6 specific dataset candidates (name + likely host) with a fit score (1–5), freshness score (1–5), expected columns, likely license, and a 30-second on-page check I should perform for each. Deliver in a compact table-like list I can scan fast.”

Step-by-step: from idea to test in 60 minutes

1. Define the gate. Write your hypothesis, name the business decision it drives, list must-have vs nice-to-have variables, set constraints (format, rows, license, dates).
2. Run the Query Builder prompt. Expect: synonym map, negative filters, 6 search queries, and 6 ranked candidates with quick checks.
3. Paste queries into your browser. Open the top 3 results per query. Perform the 30-second check the AI provided: scan for column names containing your variables or synonyms, scan license text, confirm file size/row hints.
4. Shortlist 2 candidates. Download a sample or preview. If no preview, skip. Don’t waste time on opaque pages.
5. Rapid fit test (7 minutes per file). Ask AI: “Given these column headers and first 20 rows [paste], rate variable coverage (0–100%), estimate null risk, confirm format, and draft a 3-step cleaning checklist.” If coverage <70% on must-have variables, reject.
6. Run the cleaning checklist. Typical: convert dates to ISO, standardize categories, drop rows with critical nulls, keep only relevant columns.
7. First validation chart. Create a single histogram for your outcome and a scatter/cross-tab with your main predictor. If the relationship is at least plausible and the data passes license/PII checks, proceed to analysis. If not, iterate the search with tightened synonyms or expanded geography/date range.

Copy-paste AI prompt: Evaluator + Cleaning Plan

“Here is a dataset preview: [paste URL text or page excerpt], and here are the first 30 lines of headers/sample rows: [paste]. Must-have variables: [list]. Constraints: [CSV, ≥N rows, no PII, CC0/public domain]. 1) Score variable coverage (0–100%) and list exact column matches vs synonyms, 2) flag likely license and PII risks, 3) estimate null rates from the sample, 4) give a 3-step cleaning checklist, 5) decide Go/No-Go with one-line reason.”

What to expect

• Two viable datasets within 30–60 minutes.
• A clear Go/No-Go on each based on variable coverage and license.
• A minimal cleaning plan you can execute quickly.

KPIs to track

• Time-to-shortlist: <30 minutes for 4–6 candidates.
• Variable coverage (must-have): ≥70% to proceed; >90% ideal.
• License clarity: 100% verified before download.
• Null threshold (critical fields): <10% after cleaning.
• Time-to-first-chart: <60 minutes from start.

Mistakes and quick fixes

• Searching by topic, not variables. Fix: lead with the synonym map and exclude terms (e.g., -image -NLP -synthetic).
• Over-tight constraints. Fix: relax one dimension at a time (date range, geography, file type) and rerun the prompt.
• License guesswork. Fix: treat unknown as “no” until confirmed on the host page.
• Sampling too little. Fix: always paste headers and 20–30 rows for AI evaluation before committing.

1-week plan (lightweight)

1. Day 1: Write hypothesis, decision, variables, constraints. Run Query Builder prompt. Save 6 queries and the ranked list.
2. Day 2: Execute searches. Perform 30-second checks. Download 2 samples.
3. Day 3: Run Evaluator prompt on both samples. Choose one Go.
4. Day 4: Apply the 3-step cleaning checklist. Document variable coverage and null metrics.
5. Day 5: Build the two quick charts. Record initial signal (direction, magnitude).
6. Day 6: If the signal is weak, iterate search with expanded synonyms or broader date/geography. If strong, draft a one-page result.
7. Day 7: Decision review: proceed to deeper analysis or archive and pivot.

Bottom line: Don’t chase datasets; define the gate and let AI do precision sourcing. You control the criteria, the AI supplies candidates and queries, and you move to evidence fast. Your move.

[Author]

Posts