[Rick Retirement Planner]

I’m writing a report where I’ll do the detailed analysis, but I’d like AI to help create the structure, headings, and a clear flow so my findings are easy to read. Has anyone used AI this way and found a simple, reliable workflow?

Specifically, I’m looking for practical advice on:

• Effective prompts: short examples I can reuse to ask an AI to draft an outline or section headings.
• Tools and workflow: which tools or steps work best for non-technical users (draft, revise, keep my voice).
• Quality checks: how to ensure the outline matches my analysis and isn’t misleading.

If you have sample prompts, templates, or a simple step-by-step routine, please share. I’m happy to try a suggestion and report back.

[aaron]

Quick win: Yes — use AI to create the skeleton while you focus on the analysis. That split speeds delivery and preserves control.

The problem: You spend hours structuring reports; the analysis is the value. AI can create consistent, appropriate outlines, but only if you give it the right inputs and guardrails.

Why this matters: Faster iteration, fewer structural revisions, clearer stakeholder reviews. You reduce time-to-decision and increase the chance your analysis drives action.

What I’ve learned: Use AI for format, headings, and recommended evidence placement. Keep human-in-the-loop for judgement, nuance, and interpretation. Combine a short brief + examples + constraints and you’ll get usable outlines first pass.

• Do: Give the AI the report purpose, audience, required length, and a few data points or file names.
• Do not: Assume the AI knows your audience priorities — tell it.

Step-by-step (what you’ll need, how to do it, what to expect):

1. Prepare a 2–4 sentence brief: purpose, audience, key takeaway.
2. Collect core inputs: dataset names, KPIs, charts to reference, and one example report format you like.
3. Run the AI with a clear instruction to produce an outline with headings, suggested word counts per section, and where to place data citations.
4. Review and annotate the outline (5–15 minutes). Keep only structural edits — not phrasing.
5. Hand the annotated outline to your analyst team or use it to write your analysis; repeat if needed.

Copy-paste prompt to use (plain English):

“You are an executive report writer. Create a detailed outline for a 1,200–1,500 word report titled: [Report Title]. Audience: [Role, e.g., C-suite sales leaders]. Objective: [decision or insight required]. Include: suggested section headings, 1–2 sentence purpose for each section, recommended word count per section, placeholders for specific charts or tables (name them), and 3 recommended calls-to-action. Use a concise, business tone.”

Worked example (output you should expect):

• Executive Summary (150–200w): 2-sentence conclusion + 1 line of recommended action.
• Key Metrics Snapshot (150w): table of Revenue, GM%, Conversion, YoY change — reference Chart 1.
• Drivers Analysis (400w): channel performance, top 3 wins/losses with evidence bullets and links to Chart 2/Appendix A.
• Risks & Sensitivities (200w): 3 risks with impact and likelihood; recommended mitigations.
• Recommendations & Next Steps (200–300w): prioritized actions with owners and timelines.
• Appendix/Data Sources: list files and assumptions.

Metrics to track:

• Time to first outline (target <15 minutes)
• Outline acceptance rate (% accepted without structural edits)
• Revision rounds per report (target ≤2)
• Time from draft to final (days)

Common mistakes & fixes:

• Vague brief → AI produces vague outline. Fix: give audience and decision explicitly.
• Over-editing structure → creates churn. Fix: limit structural review to 15 minutes.
• Missing data placeholders → AI omits citations. Fix: include chart/table names in inputs.

1-week action plan:

1. Day 1: Draft 3 one-paragraph briefs for upcoming reports.
2. Day 2: Run AI to produce outlines; pick one and review.
3. Day 3: Use outline to write or collect analysis; annotate gaps.
4. Day 4: Finalize one report and measure time saved.
5. Day 5: Tweak prompt and checklist based on feedback; document template.

Next step: run the provided prompt with one brief and share the outline you get. I’ll show which edits reduce revisions and give you a template to reuse.

Your move.

[Steve Side Hustler]

Nice callout — that short brief + examples + constraints trick is the real multiplier. It gets the AI into the right lane so you’re not fixing structure, just filling in insight.

Here’s a tiny, repeatable workflow you can try in under five minutes and then expand into a steady habit. It keeps you in control of interpretation while letting AI handle the boring part: the skeleton.

What you’ll need: one-sentence report purpose, the role of your audience, 3 named KPIs or chart filenames, and a target length (short, medium, long).

1. 2-minute setup — Write one clear sentence: purpose (decision expected) and one-line audience note (e.g., “regional ops director; needs staffing decision”). List 3 KPIs or chart names you’ll cite.
2. 1-minute run — Ask the AI to produce an outline: section headings, one-line purpose for each, suggested word counts, and explicit placeholders where each KPI/chart should be cited. (Keep the instruction conversational — no need to paste a long script.)
3. 5–15 minute review — Use the quick checklist below to accept or tweak structure. Limit edits to headings/placement, not full paragraphs.
4. Hand off or fill in — Give the annotated outline to your analyst or use it yourself to write the analysis. Expect a second pass to add nuance and source notes.

Quick 15-minute review checklist:

• Does the Executive Summary state the decision clearly? (1–2 lines)
• Are the KPIs placed where evidence will best support the argument?
• Is there a short Risks/Assumptions section so readers see uncertainties up front?
• Are recommendations listed with a suggested owner and timeline?

What to expect: a usable outline in under 15 minutes that cuts your structuring time dramatically. First few runs may need small edits — after 3–5 reports you’ll have a template that’s 80% right first try.

Mini experiment (one hour): pick this week’s report, run the workflow, and track only two things: time to usable outline, and whether the stakeholder asked for a structural change. If time to outline drops and structural changes fall, you’ve won.

If you want, try this twice: once where you write the brief, and once where an analyst writes it — compare which brief gets the cleaner outline. That single comparison teaches more than a week of guessing.

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win: Yes — use AI to draft the skeleton so you can focus on the analysis. Do this once and you cut hours from every report.

Why this works: AI is great at structure and consistency. You are the expert on interpretation. Give the AI clear guardrails and it returns a usable outline you can fill fast.

What you’ll need:

• One-sentence brief: purpose + decision expected.
• Audience: role and priorities (e.g., CFO — cash & risk first).
• 3 named KPIs or chart filenames you’ll cite.
• Target length: short (800w), medium (1,200w), long (1,800w).

Step-by-step (do this in under 15 minutes):

1. Write the 1-sentence brief and list the 3 KPIs/charts (2 minutes).
2. Run the AI with the prompt below to generate an outline (1 minute).
3. Review structure for 5–15 minutes: fix headings, move KPI placeholders, confirm decision is clear. Limit edits to structure only.
4. Either hand the annotated outline to an analyst or use it yourself to write the analysis and add citations.
5. Do one quick pass to add Risks/Assumptions and 2–3 prioritized actions with owners/timelines.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use this exactly):

“You are an executive report writer. Create a detailed outline for a 1,200–1,500 word report titled: [Report Title]. Audience: [Role, e.g., regional ops director]. Objective: [decision required]. Include: section headings, 1–2 sentence purpose for each section, suggested word count per section, explicit placeholders to cite these KPIs/charts: [ChartA.png, KPI Revenue, KPI Conversion], and 3 recommended calls-to-action with owners and 30/60/90 day timelines. Use a concise, business tone.”

Prompt variants:

• Quick (short outline): “Create a 600–800w outline for [Title]. Audience: [role]. Include 6 headings, 1-line purpose each, and where to cite [KPI names].”
• Detailed (appendix + evidence): “Create a 2,000w outline and an Appendix. For each main claim, list which chart or data file should be cited and a one-sentence evidence note.”

Worked example — what you’ll get:

• Executive Summary (150w): decision + 2 recommended actions.
• Key Metrics Snapshot (150w): table placeholder — reference Chart1.png.
• Drivers & Evidence (450w): 3 drivers with bullets linking to Chart2/Chart3.
• Risks & Assumptions (150w): 3 items with impact & mitigation.
• Recommendations & Next Steps (200w): owner + 30/60/90 day timeline.
• Appendix: data sources and file names.

Common mistakes & fixes:

• Vague brief → AI gives generic structure. Fix: state the decision and audience priority in 1 line.
• Over-editing → wastes time. Fix: limit structural edits to 15 minutes.
• No KPIs listed → outline omits evidence slots. Fix: include exact chart/file names.

5-day action plan:

1. Day 1: Create 3 one-line briefs for upcoming reports.
2. Day 2: Run the main prompt and pick the best outline.
3. Day 3: Fill in analysis for one section and add citations.
4. Day 4: Finalize the report; measure time spent vs usual.
5. Day 5: Tweak prompt based on feedback and save as template.

Closing reminder: Start small. Use the outline for one report this week and measure two things: time to usable outline and whether stakeholders asked for structural changes. If time drops and structural changes fall, you’ve earned the habit.

[Ian Investor]

Nice point: the single-sentence brief + named KPIs trick is the multiplier — it gets the AI into the right lane so you tweak structure, not write it from scratch. I’ll build on that with a compact checklist, a clear step-by-step you can follow in under 15 minutes, and a practical worked example you can reuse.

Do / Do not

• Do: Tell the AI the decision you want, the audience role and one priority (e.g., cost vs. growth), 3 exact KPI or chart filenames, and a target length or format.
• Do: Provide one sample report structure you like (even a short bulleted outline) so tone and level match stakeholders.
• Do not: Assume the AI knows which evidence matters — name the charts and where they belong.
• Do not: Spend more than 15 minutes on structural edits; iterate content in later passes.

Step-by-step (what you’ll need, how to do it, what to expect)

1. What you’ll need: one-sentence brief (purpose + decision), audience + priority, 3 KPI/chart names, preferred length (short/medium/long), one example outline you like.
2. How to do it: ask the AI (conversationally) to produce an outline with section headings, 1–2 line purpose per section, suggested word counts, and explicit placeholders for each KPI/chart.
3. Review: spend 5–15 minutes. Confirm the Executive Summary states the decision, move KPI placeholders if needed, and add a Risks/Assumptions box.
4. Fill: hand the annotated outline to an analyst or write sections yourself; add citations and one-line evidence notes under each claim.
5. What to expect: a usable, stakeholder-ready outline in under 15 minutes; after 3–5 runs you’ll have a template that’s right first pass ~80% of the time.

Worked example (what the AI output should look like)

• Executive Summary (150–200w): 2-sentence decision, 1 recommended action with owner.
• Key Metrics Snapshot (120–150w): table placeholder — cite Chart_A.png (Revenue, GM%, Conversion, QoQ).
• Drivers & Evidence (350–450w): 3 driver sections, each with a 1-line claim, 2 evidence bullets linking to Chart_B.png / Chart_C.csv.
• Risks & Assumptions (120–180w): 3 items with impact and suggested mitigations.
• Recommendations & Next Steps (150–250w): prioritized actions, owner, 30/60/90-day milestones.
• Appendix & Data Sources: list file names, definitions, and a short note on data freshness.

Concise refinement tip: ask the AI to tag each claim with a simple confidence label (High / Medium / Low) and the primary data source — that forces it to place evidence and helps stakeholders scan risk quickly.

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win: Let AI build the frame while you do the thinking. With a tight brief and named KPIs, you’ll get a clean outline in minutes and keep full control of the analysis.

Do / Do not

• Do: State the decision in one sentence and name the audience and their priority (e.g., CFO — cash first).
• Do: List 3 exact KPIs or chart filenames to cite (e.g., Chart_A.png, KPI Churn, Table_Pricing.csv).
• Do: Set a target length (short/medium/long) and ask for word counts per section.
• Do: Include one sample outline you like so tone and detail match your stakeholders.
• Do not: Let AI guess what matters — tell it where each KPI/chart belongs.
• Do not: Spend more than 15 minutes on structure; save wording and nuance for your analysis pass.
• Do not: Skip risks/assumptions — executives trust reports that surface uncertainty.

What you’ll need

• One-sentence brief: purpose + decision + time horizon.
• Audience + one priority (cost, growth, risk, or quality).
• Three KPIs or chart/data filenames to anchor evidence.
• Target length (e.g., 1,200–1,500 words) and required sections.
• One example report structure you like (bulleted is fine).

Step-by-step (10–15 minutes)

1. Draft the brief (2 minutes): “We need a Q3 retention plan; decide whether to invest in onboarding vs. pricing by Monday.” Audience: COO (speed, risk). KPIs: Churn, NPS, Ticket SLA.
2. Generate the skeleton (1 minute) with the prompt below. Ask for headings, purpose lines, word counts, and explicit placeholders for each KPI/chart.
3. Friction test (3 minutes): Check the Executive Summary states the decision, KPI placeholders sit under the right claims, and there’s a short Risks/Assumptions section.
4. Evidence map pass (4 minutes): Ask the AI to add a mini “Evidence Map” (claim → KPI/chart → file → confidence). This forces citation discipline.
5. Lock structure (3 minutes): Move placeholders if needed, cap total words, and tag any open data gaps. Stop editing structure.
6. Hand-off: You or your analyst fills analysis and citations. Expect one quick structural tweak after stakeholder review.

Copy-paste AI prompt (initial outline)

“You are an executive report architect. Create a detailed outline for a [target length, e.g., 1,200–1,500 word] report titled: [Report Title]. Audience: [Role + priority, e.g., COO — speed & risk]. Decision needed: [one sentence]. Constraints: [deadline, scope, must-include sections]. Include: (1) section headings, (2) 1–2 sentence purpose per section, (3) suggested word count per section, (4) explicit placeholders to cite these KPIs/charts: [KPI_1, KPI_2, Chart_A.png, Table_B.csv], (5) 3 calls-to-action with owners and 30/60/90-day milestones, and (6) a short Risks & Assumptions section. End with an ‘Evidence Map’ listing: Claim ID, Claim, KPI/Chart, File name, Confidence (High/Med/Low). Use a concise, business tone.”

Refinement prompt (2nd pass)

“Revise the outline you just produced to: (a) keep total words within [X], (b) place KPI_1 in the Executive Summary and KPI_2 in Drivers, (c) add a ‘Non-Goals & Out-of-Scope’ section (80–120 words), (d) ensure each claim in Drivers has exactly one chart or file cited, and (e) label each claim with a simple confidence tag and the primary data source. Preserve headings and CTAs. Use numbered placeholders like [C1], [Fig2] for easy reference.”

Worked example you can reuse (expected output pattern)

• Executive Summary (150–200w): Decision: “Prioritize onboarding overhaul over pricing change in Q4.” Cite KPI Churn and Chart_A_Churn.png. One action: “Appoint Ops lead; 30/60/90 plan.”
• Key Metrics Snapshot (120–150w): Table placeholder with Churn, NPS, Ticket SLA, LTV/CAC. Cite Table_KPI_Q3.csv.
• Drivers & Evidence (350–450w): Three drivers. Example: [C1] “New-user churn rose +1.8 pts post v2.4” → cite Chart_B_Cohorts.png; confidence: High. [C2] “Refund spike tied to onboarding friction” → cite Table_RefundReasons.csv; confidence: Med.
• Customer Signals (120–160w): Qualitative quotes summary. Cite NPS_Comments_Q3.xlsx; confidence: Med.
• Risks & Assumptions (120–180w): 3 items with impact, likelihood, mitigation. Example: Data freshness risk (Med) → mitigation: lock dataset as-of 30 Sep.
• Recommendations & Next Steps (180–240w): 3 actions with owners and 30/60/90-day milestones; note expected KPI movement per action.
• Non-Goals & Out-of-Scope (80–120w): What we are not doing (e.g., pricing A/B this quarter). Keeps focus tight.
• Appendix & Data Sources: File list + definitions + last refresh date.
• Evidence Map (inline table in outline): [C1] → Chart_B_Cohorts.png, High; [C2] → Table_RefundReasons.csv, Med; [C3] → KPI_NPS, Low.

Insider tricks

• Confidence tagging: Force High/Med/Low next to every claim; stakeholders scan risk faster.
• Non-Goals box: Cuts “can we also…” scope creep in meetings.
• Word budget by decision weight: Put 40–50% of words into Drivers & Recommendations; trim long context.

Common mistakes & quick fixes

• Vague decision → generic outline. Fix: state the exact choice and deadline in the brief.
• Missing evidence slots → weak arguments. Fix: name 3 KPIs/files and tell the AI where to cite them.
• Over-editing structure → churn. Fix: cap structural edits at 15 minutes; move on to analysis.
• No risks/assumptions → pushback later. Fix: add a 3-bullet risk box with mitigation.
• Bloated Executive Summary → readers skip. Fix: 2-sentence decision + 1 action, max.

1-week action plan

1. Day 1: Draft three one-sentence briefs with audience priority and 3 KPIs each.
2. Day 2: Run the initial prompt for each; pick the cleanest outline.
3. Day 3: Do the evidence map pass; fill one section with your analysis and citations.
4. Day 4: Present the outline to a stakeholder; record structural change requests.
5. Day 5: Tweak your prompt and save the final as your team template.

Closing reminder: Start with one report this week. If your time to usable outline drops below 15 minutes and structural change requests fall, you’ve shifted the work where it belongs — AI handles the skeleton; you deliver the insight.

[aaron]

Smart call on the Evidence Map and Non‑Goals box — those two strip out 80% of meeting churn. I’ll add one lever that moves results faster: bake KPI thresholds and decision gates into the outline itself so recommendations are tied to measurable outcomes before anyone writes a paragraph.

Do / Do not

• Do: Attach a target and floor to each KPI (e.g., “Churn < 5.5% by Q4 close; alert if ≥ 6.2%”). Put these as Decision Gates under each recommendation.
• Do: Ask for an Executive Read Path at the top: 3 bullets (decision, KPI deltas, first action) + 1 figure placeholder.
• Do: Map sections to slide titles and one visual each. Your outline becomes a slide-ready plan in one pass.
• Do not: Let context bloat. Cap context to 10–15% of total words; put weight into Drivers and Actions.
• Do not: Approve any outline without explicit KPI baselines, targets, and data file names beside claims.

Step-by-step (what you’ll need, how to do it, what to expect)

1. What you’ll need: report title; one-sentence decision and deadline; audience role + priority (cost/growth/risk/quality); 3–5 KPIs with baseline → target → floor; exact file/chart names; any must-include sections.
2. How to do it: run the prompt below to generate an Outcome‑Back Outline: sections + purpose lines, word budget, explicit placements for each KPI/chart, Decision Gates per recommendation, an Executive Read Path, and a slide map.
3. Review (10–15 minutes): move KPI placeholders under the right claims, confirm each recommendation has a KPI Gate (target and failure trigger), trim context, add one Risk/Assumption per major claim.
4. Fill: you or an analyst writes analysis under each claim and attaches the cited chart/file. Keep the outline’s labels ([C1], [Fig2]) so reviews reference evidence quickly.
5. What to expect: a 12–15 minute path to a stakeholder-ready skeleton; after 3–5 runs, first-pass acceptance should land near 80% with minimal structural rework.

Copy-paste AI prompt (Outcome‑Back Outline)

“You are an executive report architect. Build a detailed outline for a [1,200–1,500 word] report titled [Report Title]. Audience: [Role + priority]. Decision due: [date]; decision to make: [one sentence]. Include: (1) section headings, (2) 1–2 sentence purpose per section, (3) word count per section, (4) explicit placeholders for these KPIs/charts/files: [KPI_1 (baseline→target→floor), KPI_2, Chart_A.png, Table_B.csv], (5) an Executive Read Path (3 bullets: decision, KPI deltas, first action + one figure placeholder), (6) for each recommendation, add a Decision Gate: target KPI, timeframe, fallback if target not met, (7) a slide map: slide title, key visual, talk track (1 line), and (8) a Risks & Assumptions box with confidence tags (High/Med/Low). Use concise, business language and numbered claim IDs [C1..].”

Refinement prompt (Slides-ready)

“Convert the outline into a slide plan. For each major section, output: Slide Title, Objective (1 line), Visual Placeholder (Chart/Table name), Key Message (≤15 words), Decision Gate (if applicable), and Notes (≤2 bullets). Keep the Executive Read Path as Slide 1. Ensure total slides ≤ [N].”

Worked example (expected pattern)

• Executive Read Path: • Decision: “Increase Q4 pipeline by 18% by reallocating SDR hours to partner-sourced leads.” • KPI delta: SQLs +22% target (floor +12%), Win rate stable (±1pt). • First action: “Shift 20% SDR time to partners; launch 2 plays in 14 days.” Figure: Chart_Pipeline_Forecast.png.
• Executive Summary (150–200w): 2-line conclusion; cite KPI_SQLs (baseline 1,100 → target 1,298 → floor 1,232) and KPI_WinRate (22% → hold). One owner + date.
• Key Metrics Snapshot (120–150w): Table: SQLs, Win Rate, Cycle, ACV, QoQ change — cite Table_GTM_Q3.csv.
• Drivers & Evidence (350–450w): [C1] “Partner-sourced SQLs convert 1.4x vs. cold outbound” → Chart_Partner_vs_Outbound.png (High). [C2] “Sequence fatigue driving reply rates down 18%” → Table_ReplyRates.csv (Med). [C3] “New ICP vertical lifts ACV +9%” → Chart_ACV_BySegment.png (Med).
• Risks & Assumptions (120–160w): Data freshness (Med); Partner capacity (Med); Seasonality (Low). Mitigations noted.
• Recommendations & Next Steps (200–260w): R1: Reallocate 20% SDR time to partners. Decision Gate: SQLs ≥ 1,298 by Dec 31; fallback: revert 10% and add paid retargeting. R2: Refresh 2 sequences; Gate: Reply Rate ≥ 6.0% in 21 days; fallback: swap subject lines set B. R3: ICP pilot expansion; Gate: ACV ≥ +5% with no cycle slippage; fallback: cap at 20 accounts.
• Appendix & Data Sources: File list + last refresh + definitions.
• Slide Map (outline): S1 Exec Read Path; S2 Snapshot (table); S3–S5 Drivers (one chart each); S6 Risks; S7–S9 Recommendations with Decision Gates; S10 Appendix.

Metrics that tell you it’s working

• Time to first usable outline (target: ≤15 minutes)
• Outline acceptance rate (no structural edits) — aim ≥80%
• Decision latency from draft to sign-off (days) — trend down
• CTA adoption rate at 30 days (owners started work) — aim ≥90%
• Gate hit rate (percent of recommendations meeting KPI target by deadline)
• Outline-to-slide conversion time (target: ≤45 minutes)

Common mistakes & fixes

• No KPI floors → weak guardrails. Fix: add a minimum acceptable performance for each KPI with a fallback plan.
• Vague owners → stalled actions. Fix: name a single owner with start date and first deliverable.
• Too many visuals → noise. Fix: one chart per claim; extras go to appendix.
• Overlong context → skimming. Fix: cap context at 150–200 words total.

1‑week plan

1. Day 1: Pick one upcoming report. Define decision, deadline, audience priority, 3–5 KPIs with baseline→target→floor.
2. Day 2: Run the Outcome‑Back Outline prompt. Time the run; cap edits at 15 minutes.
3. Day 3: Add data files, fill two claims with analysis and charts. Insert Decision Gates.
4. Day 4: Convert to slides with the refinement prompt. Present to one stakeholder; log structural edits requested.
5. Day 5: Review metrics (time, acceptance, edits). Tweak thresholds and the prompt; save as your team template.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts