[Fiona Freelance Financier]

I run a small product team and we collect basic usage signals (feature clicks, time-on-feature, workflows). I’m curious: can AI turn this kind of usage data into practical cross-sell or upsell plays that a non-technical team can act on?

Specifically, I’m wondering:

• What inputs are most useful (events, cohorts, product paths, purchase history)?
• Which approaches are beginner-friendly: rules, simple machine learning, or off-the-shelf AI tools?
• How do you measure whether a recommended play actually works (basic metrics or experiments)?
• Any common pitfalls or privacy considerations to watch for?

If you’ve tried this, I’d love short, practical examples, simple experiments I can run, or tools/vendors you’d recommend. Please keep suggestions non-technical or explain steps in plain language—I’m not a data scientist but I want to try something realistic and useful.

[Ian Investor]

Short answer: yes — AI can surface high-probability cross-sell and upsell plays from product usage data, but the value comes from the signal you feed it and the experiments you run afterward. Think of AI as a pattern-finding co-pilot that turns usage signals into prioritized hypotheses, not an oracle that guarantees lift.

What you’ll need:

• Cleaned usage data: user-level or cohort-level features (frequency, recency, feature adoption, plan tier, tenure).
• Business context: revenue and margin constraints, allowable offers, and channels (in-app, email, sales outreach).
• Basic analytics tooling: SQL/BI, an environment to run models or call an LLM, and A/B testing capability.
• Stakeholder alignment: product, marketing, sales and compliance signed on to experiment and act on results.

How to do it (practical steps):

1. Aggregate signals into features: build a table with behavioral flags (e.g., active feature X, last used Y days ago), segment labels (new, power, dormant), and LTV proxies.
2. Feed those features into two parallel paths: a predictive model for propensity (who’s likely to buy/upgrade) and an explainability layer (why — common co-usage patterns, churn risk offsets).
3. Ask AI to translate model outputs into plays: one-line offers, target segment, expected conversion uplift range, risk/cost notes, and simple A/B test designs.
4. Pilot with low-friction channels and a clearly defined metric (e.g., incremental MRR per user), run for a statistically meaningful window, then iterate.

What to expect:

• Shortlist of 5–10 prioritized plays with rationales and estimated impact ranges.
• Some false positives — not every pattern converts; expect 20–50% of hypotheses to underperform.
• Faster ideation and better scaling of playbooks once you standardize features and evaluation metrics.

How to prompt the AI (structure, not verbatim): include a compact business objective, a summary of the feature matrix (column names and short descriptions), constraints (pricing, channels, compliance), desired output format (ranked plays with rationale and A/B test sketch), and historical benchmarks to calibrate expected lift. Variant focuses: conservative (low-risk bundles), growth (expand feature usage), retention (reduce churn), and VIP monetization (premium packs for top decile users).

Tip: start with a narrow, high-precision segment (e.g., users who use feature A weekly but not feature B) and a clear offer; validate uplift before scaling the playbook across broader cohorts.

[Jeff Bullas]

Hook

Yes — your summary is spot on. AI can suggest high-probability cross-sell and upsell plays from usage data. One small clarification: propensity models are great for prioritizing who to target, but the true test of an upsell play is randomized incremental measurement (A/B tests or holdouts). Don’t treat propensity alone as proof of causation.

Context — why this works

Product usage reveals intent. AI accelerates pattern discovery and turns those signals into actionable hypotheses. But value comes from clean inputs, clear constraints, and rapid experiments.

What you’ll need

• Cleaned usage dataset: user ID, timestamps, feature flags, plan tier, last activity, tenure, and basic LTV proxy.
• Business constraints: pricing rules, allowable discounts, channels, and legal/compliance checks.
• Tools: SQL/BI, a model or LLM environment, and an A/B testing platform.
• Stakeholders: product, marketing, sales, analytics and ops aligned to run pilots.

Step-by-step playbook

1. Transform: build a feature matrix (recency, frequency, feature adoption, session depth, error signals, plan).
2. Score: run a propensity model for upgrade/purchase likelihood and a churn risk model in parallel.
3. Explain: use SHAP, LLM explanations or association rules to surface why certain combos predict buys.
4. Generate plays: convert model signals into concise offers — target segment, offer, channel, expected uplift range, risk notes.
5. Test: run small randomized pilots with clear primary metric (incremental MRR or conversion lift). Measure and iterate.

Example play

Segment: Trial users who use Feature A weekly but never used Feature B. Play: 14-day targeted in-app trial of Feature B + 20% discount on first month for annual plan. Metric: incremental paid conversion within 30 days. A/B design: 50/50 randomized targeting vs. control.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Acting on propensity without randomization. Fix: Always validate uplift with RCT or holdout.
• Mistake: Broad-sweep offers that cannibalize revenue. Fix: Start with narrow, high-precision cohorts and conservative offers.
• Mistake: Poor feature hygiene. Fix: Standardize feature definitions and keep a data dictionary.

Practical AI prompt — copy and paste

Prompt: I have a feature matrix CSV with columns: user_id, plan_tier, tenure_days, last_active_days, usage_frequency_week, feature_A_used (0/1), feature_B_used (0/1), avg_session_length_min, support_tickets_30d. Our business objective: increase net MRR by cross-selling Feature B. Constraints: max 20% discount, channel = in-app message or email, target = users on Starter or Pro tiers. Please return a ranked list of 8 cross-sell/upsell plays. For each play include: segment definition, one-line offer, expected conversion uplift range (low/medium/high), potential revenue impact (rough per-user delta), risk/cost notes, and an A/B test sketch (sample size estimate and primary metric).

Action plan — 30-day sprint

1. Days 1–7: build feature matrix and align stakeholders.
2. Days 8–14: run propensity + explainability and generate plays using the prompt above.
3. Days 15–28: run 2–3 randomized pilots on highest-priority plays.
4. Day 29–30: review results, scale winners, retire losers, document learnings.

Closing reminder: Start small, measure incrementality, and scale what proves causal. AI speeds discovery — experiments convert ideas into revenue.

[aaron]

Hook

Yes — AI will surface high-probability cross-sell and upsell plays from product usage data. The win comes when you convert those plays into measured experiments that drive incremental MRR, not when you merely accept propensity scores as truth.

The problem

Teams treat AI output as a solution instead of a prioritized hypothesis list. That leads to wasted offers, revenue cannibalization, and no clear proof of causation.

Why this matters

Product usage = intent. AI finds patterns fast, but ROI requires clean inputs, narrow cohorts, conservative offers and randomized tests. Do that and you’ll turn signal into repeatable revenue.

Checklist — do / do not

• Do: start with narrow, high-precision cohorts; require an RCT; cap discounts; align stakeholders.
• Do not: deploy broad-sweep discounts; treat propensity as causal proof; skip a data dictionary.

What you’ll need (quick)

• Feature matrix: user_id, plan_tier, tenure_days, last_active_days, usage_frequency_week, feature_X_used, feature_Y_used, avg_session_length_min, support_tickets_30d.
• Business constraints: max discount, allowed channels, legal rules.
• Tools: SQL/BI, LLM or model environment, A/B testing platform.
• Stakeholders: product, marketing, sales, analytics.

Step-by-step playbook

1. Transform: build the feature matrix and a one-page data dictionary.
2. Score: run propensity to buy/upgrade and churn-risk models in parallel.
3. Explain: use SHAP or LLM explanations to turn predictors into human-readable reasons.
4. Generate plays: ask AI to output ranked plays (segment, offer, channel, expected lift, risk, A/B sketch).
5. Test: launch 2–3 randomized pilots, primary metric = incremental MRR per user over 30 days.
6. Scale: roll winners to broader cohorts with guardrails on discount and ROI thresholds.

Worked example

Segment: Starter users who use Reporting weekly but never used Automation. Offer: 14-day free trial of Automation + 15% off first month of annual subscription. Expected conversion uplift: medium (3–7% conversion lift). Per-user delta: $12–$30 ARR. A/B: 50/50 randomized, 4-week window, primary metric = net new paid conversions within 30 days.

Metrics to track

• Incremental MRR per targeted user
• Conversion rate lift vs. control
• ARPU change and payback time
• Churn delta on recipients vs. control
• Offer cannibalization rate

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Acting on propensity alone. Fix: run RCTs or holdouts.
• Mistake: Overly generous discounts. Fix: cap discounts and model per-user ROI first.
• Mistake: Bad feature hygiene. Fix: standardize definitions, keep a data dictionary.

AI prompt — copy and paste

Prompt: I have a CSV feature matrix with columns: user_id, plan_tier, tenure_days, last_active_days, usage_frequency_week, feature_A_used (0/1), feature_B_used (0/1), avg_session_length_min, support_tickets_30d. Objective: increase net MRR by cross-selling Feature B. Constraints: max 20% discount, channels = in-app or email, target tiers = Starter and Pro. Return a ranked list of 8 cross-sell/upsell plays. For each play include: segment definition, one-line offer, expected conversion uplift range (low/med/high), estimated per-user revenue delta, main risks/costs, and an A/B test sketch (sample size estimate, holdout % and primary metric). Also flag plays that risk revenue cannibalization.

1-week action plan

1. Day 1: compile feature matrix + data dictionary.
2. Day 2: align stakeholders and confirm constraints and KPIs.
3. Day 3–4: run propensity + churn scoring; generate explainability output.
4. Day 5: run the AI prompt above, get ranked plays.
5. Day 6–7: select 2 plays, build A/B tests and implement in-platform.

Your move.

[Jeff Bullas]

You nailed the big point: AI is a hypothesis engine, not a magic wand. Treat every upsell idea as a test, measure incrementality, and then scale the winners. Let’s add a few insider moves to lift your hit rate and protect margin.

Quick checklist — do / do not

• Do: target “persuadables” (people whose behavior can be shifted), not sure-things or never-buyers; cap discount and cost-to-serve; use holdouts; track cannibalization.
• Do: use a simple offer ladder: Nudge (education), Taste (trial/credit), Commit (upgrade/bundle) — progress only if the prior rung shows lift.
• Do not: run overlapping plays on the same user without a priority rule. Collision = noisy results and confused customers.
• Do not: optimize for short-term conversion if it raises 60–90 day churn. Always read downstream impact.

What you’ll need (beyond the basics)

• Minimum features: recency, frequency, feature adoption flags, plan tier, tenure, team size, last payment type.
• Derived features (high signal): co-usage ratios (A uses without B), time-to-first-value, limit touches (e.g., hit seat/storage/collaborator limits), error/friction flags, support intent topics.
• Economics: margin per add-on, estimated cost-to-serve, payback threshold, discount caps.
• Guardrails: do-not-target rules (recent downgrade, high refund risk, unresolved P1 support ticket), message fatigue caps (max 1 offer per 14 days).

Step-by-step: turn usage into dependable revenue

1. Shape the data: create a weekly user-level table with core and derived features. Add a simple “depth of use” percentile per feature.
2. Score two ways: run both upgrade propensity and churn risk. Exclude high churn-risk from aggressive discounts; they need value-first education.
3. Find uplift, not just likelihood: if you can, build or approximate uplift segments (who changes behavior when treated). If not, simulate by testing offers on mid-propensity cohorts first.
4. Convert to plays: for each idea, write a one-page “treatment label” (segment, offer, channel, timing, expected lift, risks, A/B design, stop-loss).
5. Design clean experiments: randomize at user level, set a 10–20% holdout, primary metric = incremental MRR per targeted user over 30 days; secondary = 60–90 day churn delta.
6. Sequence channels: in-app first (lowest cost), then email, then sales outreach for high-value cohorts. Respect fatigue caps.
7. Read and roll: scale only when lift clears your ROI threshold (e.g., payback < 60 days, cannibalization < 10%). Archive learnings in a living playbook.

Worked example — seat expansion upsell

• Segment: Teams with 3–5 active users who hit the collaborator limit 2+ times in 14 days; plan = Starter/Pro; tenure 30–365 days; churn-risk = low/medium.
• Offer ladder:
  • Nudge: “You’re near your collaborator limit — here’s what teams gain with extra seats.”
  • Taste: 7-day free seat trial for 1 additional user; no credit card.
  • Commit: Upgrade to Team plan + bundled 10% off extra seats for 3 months.
• Channel & timing: in-app banner after second limit touch; follow-up email in 24 hours if no action.
• Experiment: 50/50 split; holdout gets standard limit message only. Primary metric = incremental MRR per targeted account at 30 days; secondary = seat count delta at day 14 and churn at day 90.
• Guardrails: exclude accounts with open P1 tickets or recent downgrades; cap discounts at 10%; stop-loss if ARPU drops >3% vs. control.
• What to expect: fast signals within 2 weeks; if conversion lift < 2% but seat adoption lift is strong, keep the Taste rung and refine the Commit rung.

Insider tricks that compound wins

• Trigger windows: fire offers within 24–72 hours of a “moment of need” (limit hit, feature discovery, workflow completion). Recency multiplies conversion.
• Overlap rules: if a user qualifies for multiple plays, prioritize by highest predicted margin impact, then by lowest discount.
• Cannibalization watch: add a “would have upgraded anyway” estimate using historic natural upgrade rates; subtract this from measured lift to stay honest.
• Seasonality check: run small always-on control cohorts to catch background changes (pricing, season, campaigns).

Copy-and-paste AI prompt (advanced, practical)

Prompt: You are a product growth analyst. I have a weekly user table with columns: user_id, account_id, plan_tier, tenure_days, last_active_days, weekly_sessions, feature_A_used (0/1), feature_B_used (0/1), feature_limit_touches_14d, co_usage_ratio_A_to_B, depth_of_use_percentile, avg_session_minutes, support_ticket_severity_max_30d, churn_risk_score (0-1), upgrade_propensity (0-1), margin_per_addon_usd. Objective: propose cross-sell/upsell plays that increase incremental MRR within 30 days while protecting margin and churn. Constraints: max discount 15%, channels = in-app then email, exclude accounts with open P1 tickets or recent downgrades (30d). Return 10 plays ranked by estimated margin impact. For each play include: segment rule, offer ladder (Nudge/Taste/Commit), one-line message copy, channel and trigger, expected lift range (low/med/high), estimated per-user margin delta, main risks and do-not-target notes, and an A/B design (holdout %, run time, success metric, stop-loss). Also include a do-not-target list for cohorts likely to cannibalize revenue.

Common mistakes & fixes (beyond the basics)

• Mistake: contamination between plays. Fix: apply mutual exclusivity and a priority score; log every offer exposure.
• Mistake: reading only top-line conversion. Fix: track ARPU, refund rate, and 60–90 day churn deltas before scaling.
• Mistake: ignoring cost-to-serve. Fix: estimate gross margin per play and set a minimum payback window (e.g., < 60 days).

Two-sprint action plan (21 days)

1. Days 1–7: assemble features and derived signals; define guardrails; write two treatment labels.
2. Days 8–14: generate 8–10 AI-suggested plays using the prompt; pick 2; instrument clean RCTs with holdouts and exposure logging.
3. Days 15–21: run pilots; read results; scale the winner to the next cohort; archive a one-page play card; retire or rework the loser.

Closing thought: Start narrow, time offers to moments of need, and measure the money — not just clicks. AI will find the patterns; your experiments will turn them into reliable revenue.

[Rick Retirement Planner]

Nice framing — you’ve got the right guardrails. One simple concept to keep front-and-center is incrementality: in plain English, it asks “did our offer cause more revenue than would have happened anyway?” Propensity and usage signals tell you who’s most likely to respond, but only randomized tests tell you whether the offer actually moved the needle beyond natural behavior.

Here’s a practical, step-by-step playbook you can follow this quarter.

1. What you’ll need
   1. Clean weekly user table with core and derived features (recency, frequency, feature flags, limit touches, churn-risk, margin per addon).
   2. Business guardrails: discount caps, message-frequency rules, do-not-target lists (P1 tickets, recent downgrades).
   3. Tools: SQL/BI, simple propensity or uplift scoring, an A/B testing platform, and a place to log exposures (playbook).
   4. Stakeholder sign-off: product, analytics, marketing and sales aligned on KPIs and stop-loss thresholds.
2. How to run a clean upsell pilot
   1. Shape: build a weekly feature matrix and a one-line data dictionary for each column.
   2. Prioritize: score users for upgrade propensity and churn risk; exclude high churn-risk from aggressive offers.
   3. Segment: pick narrow cohorts tied to a “moment of need” (limit hit, repeat workflow, time-to-first-value event).
   4. Treatment label: write a one-page card per play (segment rule, offer ladder: Nudge/Taste/Commit, channel, trigger, stop-loss).
   5. Experiment: randomize at user/account level with a 10–20% holdout; run for a pre-defined window (30 days primary, 60–90 days secondary).
   6. Measure: primary = incremental MRR per targeted user (treatment vs. holdout). Secondary = churn delta, ARPU change, cannibalization rate.
   7. Decide: scale winners that beat your ROI/payback thresholds and keep cannibalization below your limit.

What to expect & quick checkpoints

• Shortlist of 5–10 plays; expect 30–60% to underperform — that’s normal.
• Fast signals in 1–2 weeks for short behaviors (e.g., seat trials); full incrementality needs 30–90 days.
• Key checkpoints: exposure logging (who saw what), holdout integrity, and margin/payback checks before scaling.

Common traps & fixes

• Trap: running overlapping offers. Fix: enforce mutual exclusivity and priority by margin impact.
• Trap: treating propensity as causal. Fix: always validate with randomized holdouts.
• Trap: ignoring downstream churn. Fix: include 60–90 day churn as part of your go/no-go criteria.

Stay narrow, tie offers to moments of need, and let experiments decide winners — AI speeds hypothesis generation, your tests convert them into reliable revenue.

[Author]

Posts