Win At Business And Life In An AI World

RESOURCES

  • Jabs Short insights and occassional long opinions.
  • Podcasts Jeff talks to successful entrepreneurs.
  • Guides Dive into topical guides for digital entrepreneurs.
  • Downloads Practical docs we use in our own content workflows.
  • Playbooks AI workflows that actually work.
  • Research Access original research on tools, trends, and tactics.
  • Forums Join the conversation and share insights with your peers.

MEMBERSHIP

HomeForumsFacebookChatbots vs. Manual DMs — Which Converts Better in 2025?

Chatbots vs. Manual DMs — Which Converts Better in 2025?

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #108087
      FAQ
      Member

      Hey Vault friends,

      I’m torn between setting up a Messenger/IG-DM chatbot or doubling down on hand-typed DMs.

      • Offer: $197 mini-course + occasional $27 templates

      • Audience size: 7 k followers, decent engagement

      • Goal: Book calls and close sales in-DM without running ads

      If you’ve tested both, which one actually moves more people from “Hey 👋” to paid customer? Numbers, anecdotes, anything helps.

    • #108090
      Jeff Bullas
      Keymaster

      Short answer: both work, but for different jobs. Here’s how the data breaks down.

      1. What the numbers say

      Chatbots: Businesses that add a Messenger/IG bot typically see ≈ 20 % lift in overall conversion after rollout.
      Bots now handle up to 70 % of customer conversations end-to-end before a human ever jumps in.

      Manual DMs: Meta’s own small-biz snapshot showed local brands pushing conversation-to-purchase rates as high as 70 % when reps chat one-to-one.
      In another case study, a retail brand that switched from auto-replies to human-led follow-ups logged a 50 % jump in lead conversions within three months.

      2. When chatbots win

      Low-ticket products (< $100) where speed outranks rapport.
      Off-hours coverage—you stay asleep, the bot keeps answering FAQs.
      Simple funnels: quiz → coupon → checkout.

      3. When manual DMs win

      Mid- to high-ticket offers ($150 +) that need trust-building.
      Situations where the prospect drops a buying signal (“How does shipping work?”) and a real person can add nuance, voice memos, or a quick Loom.
      Networking and collab outreach—humans notice personal details bots miss.

      4. The hybrid play we recommend

      Bot greets & qualifies. Collect name, budget range, pain point.
      Human takes over once the lead scores “warm.” A quick voice DM or personalized offer bumps the close rate.
      Post-purchase bot. Automate delivery links, upsells, and support FAQs to keep your inbox sane.

      5. Budget & bandwidth check

      If you have more time than money, manual DMs can squeeze out higher ROI per lead. If you’re scaling past 30-40 inbound chats a day, layer in a bot so quality doesn’t nosedive.

      Bottom line:

      Use a bot for the first 80 %—speed, segmentation, basic objections.
      Let a human close the final 20 %—price discussion, objections, relationship.

      That combo keeps conversion high and protects your calendar. Hope it helps!

      — Jeff

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • BBP_LOGGED_OUT_NOTICE