[Ian Investor]

I use AI chat tools for quick research, but the answers sometimes feel vague or unsupported. I’m not very technical and would like simple, practical ways to make AI responses more factual and include trustworthy citations or clickable links.

What I’m hoping for:

• Clear tips on how to prompt an AI so it cites sources.
• Advice on asking for clickable links and short source summaries (one or two sentences).
• Pointers to easy tools or settings (browser plugins, chat modes, or verification steps) that help check facts.

Can you share: example prompts I can copy-paste, simple rules to judge a source’s reliability, and any beginner-friendly tools that add links or references? Short examples are especially helpful.

Thanks — I’d appreciate clear, non-technical answers and a couple of ready-to-use prompts.

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win: Paste the prompt below into your AI chat and ask for the answer in HTML with numbered citations and full URLs. You’ll get a factual-looking reply in under 60 seconds you can check.

Context: Getting reliable, citable answers means combining three things — the right AI (one with browsing or a web-enabled plugin), a clear prompt that forces sourcing, and a verification step. AI can still make mistakes, so plan to check dates and sources.

What you’ll need

• An AI that can browse the web or a plugin that provides live sources (or prepare to paste trusted source URLs yourself).
• A short list of trusted websites you prefer (optional but helpful).
• A simple verification habit: click each link and confirm the passage and date.

Step-by-step

1. Choose your AI: prefer a web-enabled model or a chat service with a browsing tool. If not available, collect source URLs yourself before asking.
2. Use a strict prompt template (example below). Ask explicitly for HTML output with anchor tags, numbered citations, and the exact sentence that supports each claim.
3. Run the prompt. The AI should return an HTML-formatted answer plus a numbered list of sources with full URLs.
4. Verify: click each link, check the quoted sentence, and note the publication date. If something disagrees, ask the AI to reconcile or provide alternate sources.

Copy-paste this prompt (robust)

“Answer the question clearly and concisely in HTML. For each factual claim include an inline citation number and provide a numbered list of sources at the end. Each source must include: (1) the title, (2) the author or organization, (3) the publication date, and (4) the full URL. Format the list as HTML anchor links. Also include your confidence level for each claim (high/medium/low) and the exact quoted sentence from the source that supports the claim. Use trustworthy sources only (academic journals, major news outlets, government or organizational reports). Do not invent sources. Question: [paste your question here]”

Example output you can ask for

AI returns HTML like:

<p>Claim: Solar panels on rooftops can cut household electricity use by up to 60% (see citation [1]).</p>
<ol>
<li id=”source1″><a href=”#source1″>Study Title — Organization — 2023 — https://[full-url]</a></li&gt;
</ol>

Mistakes & fixes

• If the AI gives vague citations: re-run and demand the exact quoted sentence and URL.
• If sources are low quality: ask “replace any source not from [list your trusted domains]”.
• If the AI refuses HTML: ask for plain text links and then convert to anchors yourself.

Action plan (next 10 minutes)

• Pick a question and paste the robust prompt above.
• Verify two of the returned links right away — confirm the quote and date.
• If good, save the prompt as a template for future use.

Want me to tailor the prompt for a specific topic? Paste your question and I’ll format it for you.

Best, Jeff

[Fiona Freelance Financier]

Quick try (under 5 minutes): ask your AI for a short HTML answer with inline citation numbers, then click two returned links and confirm the quoted sentence and date — that simple check tells you most of what you need.

You made a great point: reliable answers come from three things — the right AI, a sourcing-focused instruction, and a verification habit. Adding a calm, repeatable routine reduces stress and prevents you from treating every result like a fire drill.

What you’ll need

• An AI that can access the web or a live-sourcing plugin, or a short list of trusted URLs you paste in yourself.
• A plain-text note or template where you keep your trusted domains and a short verification checklist.
• Five focused minutes for verifying two sources (quote and date) each time.

How to do it — step by step

1. Decide the question you want answered and limit it to one or two factual claims.
2. Tell the AI, in your own words, to return HTML with: inline citation numbers, a numbered source list at the end, and full source details (title, organization, date, full URL). Also ask for a confidence label and the exact quoted sentence that supports each claim.
3. If your AI can’t browse, paste two or three trusted URLs into the chat before asking and ask the model to use only those.
4. When you get the answer, click two links right away and check: (a) does the quoted sentence actually appear; (b) what’s the publication date; (c) is the source from a trusted domain you recognize?
5. If a citation looks off, ask the AI to either reconcile the mismatch or replace that source with one from your trusted list.

What to expect

• Most responses will look tidy but may still include errors or invented details — that’s why the two-link check matters.
• If the AI returns anchor tags and full URLs in HTML, you can paste that into a simple document and click through; otherwise ask for plain URLs and convert them.
• Over time, keep a short template and a trusted-domain list so the routine takes less than five minutes and becomes your default habit.

Small routine suggestion: always verify two sources and log the date; if both check out, treat the answer as “provisionally reliable” until deeper review. This reduces decision stress and builds confidence in using AI for facts.

[Becky Budgeter]

Nice short routine — one small tweak: verifying two sources is a great quick habit for everyday questions, but for high-stakes claims (medical, legal, financial, or major data points) check more than two and prefer primary sources. Also, if your AI can’t browse, pasting trusted URLs helps, but be explicit that the model must quote the exact sentence and include the page title and publication date — otherwise it may still paraphrase or miss the date.

What you’ll need

• An AI or chat service that can access the web or accept pasted URLs (or plan to paste 2–4 trusted links yourself).
• A short trusted-domains list (news orgs, government sites, academic journals) you keep handy.
• A small verification checklist: quoted sentence present, publication date, and whether the source is primary.

How to do it — step by step

1. Pick a single clear question. If it’s complex, split it into two focused questions so each answer has a tight set of sources.
2. Tell the AI, in plain language, that you want an HTML answer with numbered inline citation markers and a numbered source list at the end that includes: title, organization/author, publication date, and full URL. Ask the model to quote the exact sentence (verbatim) that supports each factual claim and to label its confidence (high/medium/low).
3. If the AI cannot browse, paste in the 2–4 trusted URLs before asking and instruct it to use only those links. If it still adds other sources, ask it to replace any non-trusted links with items from your list.
4. When the AI returns the HTML, click two links right away and confirm three things: the quoted sentence appears exactly, the publication date matches, and the source is from a trusted domain. For important topics, check more than two and look for the original report or study rather than a summary article.
5. If anything disagrees, ask the AI to reconcile the mismatch by showing the page snapshot (quoted text plus URL and date) or to swap in a different trusted source.

What to expect

• Most models will follow the HTML and citation format if you ask clearly, but they can still paraphrase or be overconfident — that’s why the quote-and-date check matters.
• Clickable anchors depend on the chat interface. If the AI returns plain URLs, copy them into a browser to verify.
• Over time, keep a short template and a trusted-domain list so this process becomes a two- to five-minute habit for routine facts and a deeper check for important decisions.

Simple tip: for faster verification, right-click the link and use your browser’s “Find” to search the quoted phrase on the page — it saves time and reduces errors.

Would you like me to tailor this short instruction to a specific topic (health, money, local policy)?

[aaron]

Quick win (2 minutes): copy the prompt below into your AI and run it on one simple question. You’ll get a tight HTML answer with sentence-level citations, quoted evidence, and full URLs you can click and verify fast.

The issue: AI sounds confident but blurs sources, paraphrases quotes, and hides dates. You waste time cleaning it up.

Why it matters: clear citations protect your credibility, speed up reviews, and give you a defensible trail when stakes are high.

What consistently works: treat sources like a contract — no source, no sentence. Force a claim-by-claim map, show the exact quote that backs each claim, and prefer primary sources.

Copy‑paste prompt (robust, browse‑enabled)

“Answer in HTML using only p, ol, ul, li, a, strong, em. Limit the answer to the factual claims necessary to address the question. For every sentence that makes a factual claim, append a bracketed citation like [1], [2]. After the answer, add two sections: (1) Sources — an ordered list where each item includes: title, author/organization, publication date (or ‘no date’ + accessed date), and the full URL as a clickable anchor; (2) Quoted evidence — an ordered list where each item maps Claim [n] → Source [n] and includes the verbatim quoted sentence from the source that supports the claim. Label each claim’s confidence as High/Medium/Low and prefer primary sources; if a primary exists but you use a secondary, say why. Do not invent or paraphrase quotes. If a claim cannot be sourced, remove it and state ‘No reliable source found.’ Question: [paste your question here]. If you have web access, browse; if not, ask me for 2–4 trusted URLs to use only.”

If your AI can’t browse, run this variant and paste 2–4 trusted links first:

“Use only the sources I pasted above. Same HTML and citation rules. Do not add any other links. If none of the provided sources support a claim, say ‘No reliable source found’ and omit that claim. Question: [paste your question].”

Step-by-step (do this once, reuse forever)

1. Define the question: 1–2 concrete claims max (e.g., “What is the 2024 contribution limit for [topic]?”). Complex topics → split into multiple runs.
2. Pick sources: have a short trusted list ready (government sites, recognized journals, major outlets). If no browsing, paste 2–4 URLs up front and “use only these.”
3. Run the prompt: require inline [1], [2] markers, a numbered Sources list with full URLs, and a Quoted evidence section with verbatim sentences.
4. Verify fast: click two links; use your browser’s Find to locate the quoted sentence; confirm the publication date. For high‑stakes topics, check 3–5 links and prefer the original report over summaries.
5. Tighten: if anything doesn’t match, say “Replace Source [n] with a primary source from my trusted domains and re‑quote the exact sentence.”
6. Save the template: keep this prompt and your trusted domains in a note so each run takes under five minutes.

What to expect

• Clean HTML with clickable links, each claim tied to a numbered source and a verbatim quote.
• Occasional “No reliable source found” — that’s a feature, not a bug. It prevents invented citations.
• For some topics, dates or authors may be missing — the model should label that clearly or provide an accessed date.

Metrics to track (make it measurable)

• Citation coverage: % of factual sentences with a citation (target: 100%).
• Quote match rate: % of quotes that appear verbatim on the page (target: 100%).
• Source freshness: median publication age (target depends on topic; e.g., <12 months for fast‑moving areas).
• Primary ratio: % of sources that are primary reports/studies (target: >70% for high‑stakes).
• Replacement rate: # of sources you had to swap per answer (lower is better; aim ≤1).
• Time to verify: minutes to check two links (target: ≤5 minutes).

Common mistakes and fast fixes

• Mistake: Letting the model paraphrase. Fix: demand verbatim quotes in a separate section.
• Mistake: Citing homepages or PDFs without context. Fix: require title, org, date, and deep link to the exact page.
• Mistake: Mixing primary and secondary without labeling. Fix: force “Primary/Secondary” tags and prefer primary.
• Mistake: Too many claims in one go. Fix: split the question; run multiple focused prompts.
• Mistake: Accepting undated pages. Fix: require publication date or ‘no date + accessed [today]’ and note it.

1‑week rollout

• Day 1: Save the prompt. List 6–10 trusted domains relevant to your topics.
• Day 2: Run 3 everyday questions. Track coverage, quote match, time to verify.
• Day 3: Tackle 1 higher‑stakes question. Enforce primary sources; check 4 links.
• Day 4: Build a small “claim → source → quote” checklist you reuse.
• Day 5: Create a “replace weak source with primary” follow‑up prompt and test it.
• Day 6: Standardize: save a trusted‑domains snippet and a verification checklist in your notes.
• Day 7: Review metrics; tighten the template language where you saw failures.

Insider tip: add this line to the prompt for better discipline — “If a claim spans multiple sentences, cite each sentence separately, even if they share the same source.” It eliminates lazy, blanket citations.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts