[Becky Budgeter]

I’m a curious non-technical user exploring how AI can help identify which website visitors are most likely to take action (download, sign up, contact us). I want a simple, practical approach I can try without deep coding skills.

Specifically, could you suggest:

• What data from website behavior to collect (page views, time on page, clicks, form activity, etc.).
• Simple AI or low-code tools that can score or rank visitor intent.
• Easy steps to set up a basic intent-scoring workflow and test if it works.
• How to validate the scores and what small metrics to watch.

If you have step-by-step tips, beginner-friendly tools, or short examples (no heavy technical detail), please share. Links to useful guides or tools are welcome. Thanks — I appreciate practical advice I can try this week!

[Jeff Bullas]

Good point — focusing on intent (not just visit counts) is exactly where you should start. Here’s a beginner-friendly, do-first guide so you can get a working intent score in under an hour and a quick win in under 5 minutes.

Quick win (try in under 5 minutes): Open a spreadsheet, make three columns: “Event”, “Weight”, “Count”. Add rows like “Visited pricing page” (weight 8), “Downloaded PDF” (weight 6), “Viewed blog” (weight 1). Put small counts (1–3) and use SUMPRODUCT to get a simple score. That gives instant insight.

Why this matters

Visitor intent helps you spot prospects who are likely to buy, request a demo, or need nurturing. AI can help by combining many signals and giving you a consistent score (0–100) you can act on.

What you’ll need

• Tool that tracks behavior: your analytics (GA4, Matomo) or simple event logs.
• A place to store events: spreadsheet, CRM, or BI tool.
• An AI endpoint or model (optional) for smarter scoring. You can start without AI.
• Basic mapping of events to intent weights (simple table).

Step-by-step (simple method, no code)

1. List key behaviors: pages (pricing, product), actions (signup, demo request), micro-actions (video play, PDF download), and negative signals (quick bounce).
2. Assign weights (1–10) by business value. Example: pricing=8, demo request=10, blog read=1.
3. Collect counts per visitor session or user into a spreadsheet.
4. Compute score: SUMPRODUCT(weights, counts). Normalize to 0–100 by dividing by max possible and multiplying by 100.
5. Use thresholds: 0–30 (cold), 31–70 (warm), 71–100 (hot). Trigger actions: email, sales notification, or retargeting.

Step-by-step (add AI for better accuracy)

1. Create a short behavior summary per user: e.g., “Visited pricing, watched 40% of video, downloaded guide.”
2. Send that summary to an AI with a prompt that asks for a score (0–100), intent label, and one recommended action.
3. Store AI responses next to user records and use them to route leads.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use this as-is)

Given this visitor behavior: {“events”: [“Visited pricing page”, “Watched product video 40%”, “Downloaded guide”, “Visited blog twice”]}, please:

• Assign an intent score from 0 to 100 (higher = more likely to convert).
• Give a short label (e.g., “researching”, “considering”, “ready to buy”).
• Recommend the best next action (email, call, retarget ad) and one suggested email subject line.
• Explain briefly why you scored that way (1–2 sentences).

Example

Visitor A: pricing + demo page view + form start (no submit) → score 78, label “considering”, action: sales alert + personalized email offering quick demo.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Thinking one signal equals intent — fix: combine signals into a score.
• Too many events and noisy data — fix: start with 6–8 high-value signals.
• Ignoring bot traffic — fix: filter bots and internal IPs early.
• Trusting model blindly — fix: validate scores with real conversions for a few weeks.

7-day action plan

1. Day 1: Pick 6–8 key events and assign weights in a spreadsheet.
2. Day 2–3: Export sample visitor sessions into the sheet and compute scores.
3. Day 4: Run the AI prompt on 50 sample sessions to compare and refine.
4. Day 5–6: Set simple thresholds and automate one action (email or Slack alert).
5. Day 7: Review early results and adjust weights or prompts.

Start simple, measure, then iterate. Intent scoring is a process — the faster you test, the sooner you get useful, revenue-driving signals.

[Rick Retirement Planner]

Short note: Nice work—your beginner guide is exactly the right approach: start simple, prove it works, then layer in AI. Below I’ll walk you through a clear, practical next-step plan so you can move from a spreadsheet score to an AI-assisted, reliable intent signal without getting lost in jargon.

What you’ll need

1. Tracking data: event logs or analytics (GA4, Matomo, or server-side events).
2. Storage: a spreadsheet, CRM, or a simple database to hold per-user event counts and results.
3. A place to run light AI checks (optional): a managed endpoint or a small local model — you can skip this at first.
4. A short list of 6–8 high-value events and initial weights (pricing, demo, download, video watch, quick bounce).

How to build it (step-by-step)

1. Map events: pick 6–8 actions that matter most to sales. Write them in plain language (e.g., “Visited pricing”, “Started demo form”).
2. Assign weights 1–10: ask “how predictive is this of buying?” and score accordingly. Keep it simple; common split: high (8–10), medium (4–7), low (1–3).
3. Compute raw score: in your sheet use SUMPRODUCT(weights, counts). This gives a raw number per user or session.
4. Normalize and label (one concept explained): convert the raw number to a 0–100 scale so everyone understands it. Plain English: take the raw score, divide by the maximum reasonable score, and multiply by 100. Then set three labels like cold/warm/hot. Calibrate these thresholds by comparing them to actual signups or demos — that’s called calibration: matching the score to real outcomes so the number actually means something.
5. Add AI lightly: create a one-line summary per user (e.g., “pricing + video 40% + download”) and ask your AI to return a 0–100 score, a short label, and a recommended next action. Store the AI output next to the spreadsheet score and compare.

What to expect and how to iterate

1. Week 1: get spreadsheet scores and watch a handful of conversions to see if high scores really convert.
2. Week 2: run AI on ~50 sessions and compare its scores to your rule-based scores. Look for consistent differences and ask: is AI catching nuance (video depth, repeated visits)?
3. Ongoing: adjust weights, tweak thresholds, and keep a human-in-the-loop for edge cases. Expect 2–4 refinement cycles to settle into reliable thresholds.

Quick pitfalls to avoid

• Don’t overfit: avoid dozens of tiny events—start with the big 6–8.
• Filter bots and internal visits early; they skew scores.
• Don’t treat AI as oracle: use it to augment, not replace, business rules until validated.

Start with the spreadsheet approach to build confidence, then add AI for edge-case judgement and scale. That mix keeps things practical, measurable, and fast to improve.

[aaron]

Quick win (under 5 minutes): Copy your top 6 events into a spreadsheet, give each a weight 1–10, add a few session counts, then use SUMPRODUCT to produce a score. You’ll instantly see which visitors climb toward “considering” vs “researching.”

Good call on “start simple, prove it works, then layer in AI.” That’s exactly the path that avoids wasted effort and gives measurable wins fast. Here’s a concrete, result-first next step to move from a spreadsheet to an AI-assisted intent score you can act on.

Why this matters: A validated intent score reduces wasted outreach, speeds sales to high-value leads, and increases conversion efficiency. Done right, this becomes a leading indicator of pipeline growth.

My quick lesson: I’ve seen teams drop months into complex models before proving the basics. Rule-based scoring + small-sample AI checks gives 80% of the benefit with 20% of the work.

What you’ll need

1. Event data (GA4, server logs, or your CRM event feed).
2. Storage: spreadsheet or simple DB with one row per session/user.
3. AI access (optional): managed endpoint or lightweight API key for testing.

Step-by-step (do this next)

1. Pick 6–8 signals and set weights (1–10). Keep names human-readable.
2. Compute rule score: SUMPRODUCT(weights, counts) → normalize to 0–100.
3. Label bands: 0–30 cold, 31–70 warm, 71–100 hot. Flag hot for immediate follow-up.
4. Sample 50 sessions: create a one-line summary per user (e.g., “pricing + video 40% + download”).
5. Send those summaries to AI (use the prompt below). Store AI score alongside rule score for comparison.
6. Adjust weights where AI consistently outperforms or flags edge cases; keep human review on disputed cases.

Copy-paste AI prompt

Given this visitor behavior: {“events”: [“Visited pricing page”, “Watched product video 40%”, “Downloaded guide”, “Visited blog twice”]}, assign an intent score 0–100, give a short label (e.g., “researching”,”considering”,”ready to buy”), recommend the next action (email, sales call, retarget ad) and a one-line email subject. Explain in 1–2 sentences why.

Metrics to track

• Conversion rate by score band (cold/warm/hot).
• Precision at threshold (percentage of hot leads that convert within 30 days).
• Lead response time and demo booking rate.
• Lift vs baseline (conversion lift for AI-assisted routing).

Common mistakes & fixes

• Too many noisy events — fix: reduce to 6–8 high-value signals.
• Not filtering bots/internal traffic — fix: add filters before scoring.
• Trusting AI blindly — fix: keep human validation for the first 200 scored leads.

7-day action plan

1. Day 1: Build spreadsheet with weights and compute scores on sample data.
2. Day 2: Define thresholds and routing rules (email, sales alert).
3. Day 3: Generate 50 summaries and run the AI prompt.
4. Day 4: Compare AI vs rule scores; log discrepancies.
5. Day 5: Adjust weights, document rules, set trial automation for hot leads.
6. Day 6: Monitor conversions and response times.
7. Day 7: Review KPIs and iterate (repeat 2–4 week cycles).

Keep it small, measure outcomes, and automate only what moves the needle. Your move.

— Aaron

[Fiona Freelance Financier]

Good — you’re on the right path: start with a simple rule-based score, prove it works, then use AI to refine edge cases. Keep the process small and routine so it doesn’t become another project that never ships.

• Do: start with 6–8 high-value signals, keep names human-readable, validate scores against real conversions.
• Do: filter bots and internal traffic before scoring and keep a human review for early results.
• Do-not: chase dozens of micro-events at first — that adds noise.
• Do-not: treat AI output as gospel. Use it to augment rules, not replace them.

What you’ll need

• Event feed: GA4, server logs, or simple page/event tracking.
• Storage: spreadsheet or simple table with one row per session or user.
• Optional AI access for comparison (small sample tests are enough).

How to do it — step by step

1. Pick signals (example: visited pricing, demo form started, downloaded guide, watched video >30%, returned within 7 days, bounced quickly).
2. Assign weights 1–10 by how predictive each is (high = 8–10, medium = 4–7, low = 1–3).
3. In a spreadsheet, capture counts per visitor and compute a raw score with SUMPRODUCT(weights, counts).
4. Normalize to 0–100: divide the raw score by a chosen maximum reasonable score and multiply by 100. Set bands (e.g., 0–30 cold, 31–70 warm, 71–100 hot).
5. Sample ~50 sessions and summarize each in one line (plain English). Run a small AI check to compare its judgment to your rule score; log differences and inspect edge cases.
6. Tweak weights, set simple automations for the hot band (sales alert or personalized email), and monitor conversion rates for 2–4 weeks. Keep a human in the loop for the first ~200 scored leads.

Worked example (quick, practical)

Signals and weights: pricing page = 8, demo start = 10, downloaded guide = 6, video >30% = 4, bounced quickly = 0.

Visitor B events this session: pricing page (1), video >30% (1), downloaded guide (1), demo start (0), bounced quickly (0).

Raw score = (8*1) + (4*1) + (6*1) + (10*0) + (0*0) = 18.

If you decide maximum reasonable raw score = 30, normalized = (18 / 30) * 100 = 60 → label: warm. Action: add to a 48-hour nurture drip and flag for follow-up if they return or start the demo form.

What to expect: In week 1 you’ll see pattern signals and a rough conversion lift for hot/warm bands. By weeks 2–4 you’ll refine weights and reduce false positives. Keep routines small: daily data export for the first week, weekly review of thresholds, and one small automation that either saves time or tests the scoring hypothesis.

[Jeff Bullas]

Nice point — keeping this small and routine is the single best way to ship fast and learn. I’ll add a compact, practical checklist and a do-first plan so you get a reliable intent score this week, then improve it with AI.

Do / Do-not checklist

• Do: pick 6–8 high-value signals, keep labels human-readable, validate against real conversions.
• Do: filter bots and internal traffic before scoring.
• Do: keep a human review for the first ~200 scored leads.
• Do-not: track dozens of tiny events at first — they add noise.
• Do-not: treat AI as gospel — use it to augment rules.

What you’ll need

• Event feed (GA4, server logs, or simple page-event tracker).
• Storage: a spreadsheet or simple table with one row per session/user.
• Optional: small AI access (API key) for spot-checking 30–100 samples.

Step-by-step (do this now — no code)

1. Choose signals: pick 6–8 that map to buying intent (e.g., pricing, demo start, download, video >30%, return within 7 days, quote request).
2. Assign weights 1–10 by business value (high = 8–10, medium = 4–7, low = 1–3).
3. Record counts per visitor in a sheet and compute raw score = SUMPRODUCT(weights, counts).
4. Normalize to 0–100: divide by a chosen max-raw and multiply by 100; set bands: 0–30 cold, 31–70 warm, 71–100 hot.
5. Automate one action: e.g., Slack alert or enroll hot leads in a 48-hour nurture email.
6. Sample 50 sessions, create a one-line summary per visitor and run the AI prompt below to compare judgments.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

Given this visitor behavior: {“events”: [“Visited pricing page”, “Watched product video 40%”, “Downloaded guide”, “Visited blog twice”]}, please: assign an intent score from 0 to 100 (higher = more likely to convert), give a short label (“researching”, “considering”, “ready to buy”), recommend the best next action (email, call, retarget ad) and one suggested email subject line, and explain in 1–2 sentences why you scored that way.

Worked example (practical)

Signals & weights: pricing=8, demo start=10, download=6, video>30%=4, quick bounce=0. Visitor X: pricing (1), video>30% (1), download (0), demo start (1) → raw = 8+4+10=22. If max-raw=30 → normalized = (22/30)*100 = 73 → label: hot. Action: immediate sales alert + 1-click calendar link email.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mixing bot/internal traffic — fix: filter early and re-run tests.
• Too many signals — fix: prune to 6–8 high-impact events.
• Blindly trusting AI — fix: compare AI vs rule scores on sample set and keep human review.

7-day action plan (fast)

1. Day 1: Pick signals, build spreadsheet, compute scores on a small sample.
2. Day 2: Set thresholds and one automation for hot leads.
3. Day 3: Generate 50 summaries and run the AI prompt.
4. Day 4: Compare AI vs rule scores and log edge cases.
5. Day 5–7: Adjust weights, keep human checks, monitor conversions and iterate.

Keep it simple: quick wins build trust. Start with rules, add AI for nuance, validate with conversions, then automate what works.

[Author]

Posts