Win At Business And Life In An AI World

RESOURCES

  • Jabs Short insights and occassional long opinions.
  • Podcasts Jeff talks to successful entrepreneurs.
  • Guides Dive into topical guides for digital entrepreneurs.
  • Downloads Practical docs we use in our own content workflows.
  • Playbooks AI workflows that actually work.
  • Research Access original research on tools, trends, and tactics.
  • Forums Join the conversation and share insights with your peers.

MEMBERSHIP

HomeForumsAI for Data, Research & InsightsHow can I use embeddings to map customer segments to product preferences?

How can I use embeddings to map customer segments to product preferences?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #125647

      Hi everyone — I manage customer segments and want a simple, practical way to use AI embeddings to connect those segments with product preferences. I’m not technical and I’m looking for beginner-friendly guidance.

      My situation: I have basic customer segments (age group, interests, past purchases) and short product descriptions. I’d like to know how embeddings could help match segments to products so I can prioritize recommendations and guide marketing.

      Can you share:

      • One simple workflow (step-by-step) that a non-technical person could follow or ask a team/vendor to do.
      • Examples of no-code or low-code tools and what input data is needed.
      • Practical outputs to expect and common pitfalls to avoid.

      I’d appreciate short, clear examples or links to friendly tutorials. If you’ve done this for a small business, please share what worked and what didn’t.

    • #125656

      Good start—focusing on mapping segments to preferences is exactly the right question. Here’s a quick win you can do in under five minutes: write one-sentence blurbs for 3 customer segments and 5 products, then use any simple “semantic similarity” or embedding tool to see which products score highest for each segment.

      What embeddings do, in plain language: they turn short text into numbers that capture meaning, so you can measure how “close” a customer description is to a product description. That closeness helps you rank product fits and spot natural groups without heavy analytics.

      What you’ll need

      • 3–10 concise customer segment descriptions (1–2 sentences each).
      • 5–30 product summaries (one line each—features and benefits).
      • A tool that produces embeddings or a simple similarity feature (many services and spreadsheet add-ins offer this).
      • A spreadsheet or simple notebook to compare and sort similarity scores.

      How to do it (step-by-step)

      1. Prepare text: keep segment and product lines short and consistent (same style and length).
      2. Generate embeddings: feed each line into your chosen tool so each becomes a numeric vector. This typically returns one vector per line.
      3. Compute similarities: for each segment, compute similarity scores against every product and rank them. In spreadsheets you can use a built-in similarity or copy-paste scores; in a notebook you’ll use a simple distance function.
      4. Make a table or heatmap: create a grid of segments vs. products and highlight the top 2–3 matches per segment. This visual makes decisions fast.
      5. Quick validation: show the top matches to a sales rep or test with 10 real customers — ask if the recommendations feel relevant.
      6. Iterate weekly: refine segment text, add new products, and re-run; keep a short log of changes to spot drift.

      What to expect

      • A prioritized list of product recommendations per segment you can act on right away.
      • Clusters that reveal similar segments or product bundles you hadn’t noticed.
      • Need for human review—embeddings capture language, so validate against behavior (purchases, clicks).

      To reduce stress, make this a small, repeatable routine: start with just three segments, run the similarity check, and spend 30 minutes once a week reviewing results and feedback. Small, steady updates beat one big, perfect project—you’ll get useful recommendations fast and improve them with real input.

    • #125660
      aaron
      Participant

      Quick win: Because there were no prior replies, I’ll start fresh and outline a practical, results-focused plan to map customer segments to product preferences using embeddings.

      The gap: You have customers and products but don’t know which products to surface to each segment. That costs conversions, wastes ad spend, and prevents personalization at scale.

      Why this matters: Mapping segments to product affinity increases conversion rate, average order value, and relevancy — not experimenting on the fly but using measurable, repeatable signals.

      Short lesson from experience: Embeddings turn text (customer notes, survey answers, product descriptions) into vectors. Similar vectors = similar intent. Use clustering + similarity scoring and validate with a small A/B test before scaling.

      1. What you’ll need
        1. Customer-level text/features (profiles, purchase history, support transcripts, survey answers)
        2. Product descriptions and tags
        3. An embeddings provider or library (OpenAI, Cohere, SentenceTransformers) or a vendor dashboard
        4. Basic tooling: spreadsheet + Python or a no-code tool that supports vector search
      2. Step-by-step implementation
        1. Prepare data: consolidate 1,000–10,000 representative customers and product texts. Clean text, remove PII, include recency and purchase frequency as attributes.
        2. Generate embeddings for each customer and each product description.
        3. Cluster customers (k-means or HDBSCAN). Label clusters by dominant attributes (top intents or descriptors).
        4. Compute cosine similarity between cluster-centroids (or individual customers) and product embeddings. Score and rank products per cluster.
        5. Surface top 3 products per segment and run a 2-week A/B test vs baseline recommendations.
      3. What to expect
        • Week 1: embeddings and clusters; Week 2: mapping + small live test
        • Immediate lift from low-effort personalization: expect measurable CTR/CR improvements within 2–4 weeks

      AI prompt (copy-paste):

      “You are a product recommendation analyst. Given the following customer profiles and product descriptions, rank the top 3 products for each customer and provide a 1-sentence rationale for each recommendation. Output JSON: {customer_id: [{product_id, score, reason}, …]}. Here are examples: [paste customer profiles and product descriptions].”

      Metrics to track

      • Conversion rate lift on recommended products (A/B)
      • Click-through rate on personalized recommendations
      • Average order value and repeat purchase rate
      • Coverage: percent of customers with confident top-3 recommendations
      • Precision@3 from validation survey or purchase follow-up

      Common mistakes & fixes

      • Poor input data — fix: standardize and enrich with recent behavior
      • Using only purchases — fix: include intent signals (search, support, survey)
      • Too many clusters or too few — fix: validate cluster coherence with silhouette score and manual review
      • Ignoring feedback loop — fix: retrain embeddings and re-score monthly
      1. 1-week action plan
        1. Day 1: Export 1,000 customer profiles + 200 product descriptions.
        2. Day 2: Clean text and decide tool (vendor API or local library).
        3. Day 3: Generate embeddings for customers and products.
        4. Day 4: Run clustering and label segments.
        5. Day 5: Score products per segment and create top-3 lists.
        6. Day 6–7: Launch a small A/B email or on-site test to measure CTR/CR.

      Your move.

    • #125669
      Jeff Bullas
      Keymaster

      Hook: You can turn customer histories into a searchable map where each customer sits near the products they’re most likely to love — using embeddings and a few simple steps.

      Quick context: An embedding converts text (or product metadata) into a vector. Vectors let you measure similarity (dot product or cosine). Map customers and products into the same vector space, then find nearest products for each customer segment.

      What you’ll need

      • Customer data: purchase history, reviews, survey answers or browsing logs (one record per customer or per event).
      • Product data: title, description, category, tags, price band.
      • An embedding model (pre-trained text embeddings) and a way to store/search vectors (simple: scikit-learn; production: FAISS or vector DB).
      • Basic tooling: Python, Jupyter, or a no-code platform that supports embeddings.

      Step-by-step

      1. Prepare input text. For each product create a concise description. For each customer aggregate events into a short profile sentence (see prompt below).
      2. Generate embeddings for all product texts and all customer profiles using the same model.
      3. Aggregate customer embeddings if necessary (e.g., mean of last N event embeddings) to form a single vector per customer.
      4. Index product vectors in a nearest-neighbor search tool. For each customer vector, query top-N nearest products by cosine similarity.
      5. Group customers by embedding similarity (clustering) to create segments and label them by the nearest product clusters or top product themes.
      6. Validate with holdout purchases and iterate.

      Worked example (mini):

      • Customer A: “bought running shoes, fitness tracker, reads running guides” → profile embedding.
      • Products: “trail running shoes”, “smartwatch fitness”, “kitchen mixer” → product embeddings.
      • Nearest neighbors for Customer A return “trail running shoes” and “smartwatch fitness” — now tag A as “active runner” segment and surface those products.

      Common mistakes & fixes

      • Don’t: Use raw event logs as-is. Do: summarize into profile text for clean embeddings.
      • Don’t: Mix embedding models. Do: use the same model for customers and products.
      • Don’t: Ignore cold-starts. Do: use demographic or survey text to seed customer embeddings.
      • Don’t: Trust first clustering. Do: validate with real purchase outcomes.

      Copy-paste prompt (use this to turn events into a profile to embed)

      “Summarize this customer’s recent activity into a one-paragraph profile that highlights top product categories, interests, buying intent, and tone (e.g., bargain-seeker, premium, research-driven). Keep it 20–40 words. Example input: [list of purchases, searches, reviews]. Output format: ‘Profile: …’”

      Action plan (next 7 days)

      1. Pick 1,000 customer records and 500 product records.
      2. Create profile texts with the prompt above and generate embeddings.
      3. Index products, run nearest-neighbor queries for customers, then sample and review results.
      4. Group customers into 5–8 segments and name them by top product themes.
      5. Measure lift with a small email or onsite recommendation test.

      Reminder: Start small, validate with real behavior, and iterate. Embeddings give quick wins when you focus on clean inputs and simple nearest-neighbor logic.

    • #125695
      Jeff Bullas
      Keymaster

      Smart focus: using embeddings to connect customer segments to product preferences is the right lever. It turns messy text (profiles, reviews, descriptions) into numbers you can compare, so the best matches naturally rise to the top.

      Try this in 5 minutes

      • Copy-paste this into your AI tool with one segment and 8–12 product blurbs to see a fast ranked list (no setup needed):“You are a marketing analyst. Given the SEGMENT and PRODUCTS, rank the top 5 products by fit. Weigh: needs, budget, deal-breakers, and value. Return a list with: rank, product name, score (0–100), and a 1-sentence reason.

        SEGMENT: [paste a 50–100 word segment summary]

        PRODUCTS: [paste a list of product name + 2–3 sentence description with price, key features, who it’s for]

        Output exactly:
        1) Product – Score – Reason
        2) … up to 5.”

      Why embeddings for this?

      • They map both segments and products into the same “meaning space.”
      • You simply find the nearest products to each segment vector.
      • It’s robust to wording differences (“pain relief for runners” ≈ “reduce knee pain after jogging”).

      What you’ll need

      • Two spreadsheets (CSV or Sheets):
        • Segments: segment_id, segment_name, segment_card (50–120 words: who, need, context, budget, deal-breakers).
        • Products: product_id, name, price, tags, product_card (2–3 sentences: what it is, who it’s for, benefits, constraints).
      • An embeddings tool or API (e.g., a text embedding model). A simple automation (Zapier/Make) or a short script can call it.
      • Somewhere to store vectors (a column in your sheet, a database, or a small vector store). For a pilot, a sheet works.

      Step-by-step (from zero to ranked matches)

      1. Standardize the text.
        • Use this prompt to create consistent segment cards:“Create a 70–100 word segment card. Use fields and labels: Who, Need, Context, Budget, Deal-Breakers, Tone. Write in full sentences, plain language.”
        • Use this prompt to create product match cards:“Write a 2–3 sentence product match card with: What it is, Who it’s for, Key benefit, Constraints (price, size, ingredients, compatibility). Keep it under 60 words.”
      2. Embed both tables.
        • For each row, send the segment_card or product_card text to your embedding model and store the returned vector as JSON in a column (e.g., segment_vec, product_vec).
        • Tip: start with a fast, low-cost embedding model for pilots; upgrade to a larger model if nuance is missing.
      3. Compute similarity.
        • For each segment vector, compute cosine similarity with every product vector and sort descending. Higher score = closer fit.
        • Practical pilot: pull top 20 by similarity, then apply simple filters (price range, inventory, compliance) to get a clean top 5.
      4. Rerank with business logic (optional but powerful).
        • Send the top 10 candidates to an LLM for a lightweight rerank. Use this prompt:“Rerank these candidate products for the SEGMENT. Prioritize fit to Need and Deal-Breakers; ensure price fits Budget. Return top 5 as JSON: [{id, score(0–100), reason(≤12 words)}]. Be strict on deal-breakers.”
      5. Validate and calibrate.
        • Sample 20 segment→product results. Mark Pass/Fail and compute a hit-rate (% good matches).
        • Iterate your cards: add missing attributes, remove fluff, keep to 50–120 words.

      What good output looks like

      • A top-5 list per segment with scores that “feel” right and tight reasons (one sentence each).
      • Consistency: the same segment yields similar products even if you tweak wording.
      • Traceability: each match can be explained from the segment and product cards.

      Example (small, realistic)

      • Segment card: Who: Busy parents with limited time. Need: 20-minute healthy dinners. Context: Weeknights, minimal cleanup. Budget: $8–$15 per meal. Deal-Breakers: No nuts; kid-friendly flavors.
      • Top matches you’d expect:
        • Meal Kit A – 89 – 15-minute pans; nut-free; kid-approved flavors.
        • Frozen Veg Bowls – 84 – Microwaves in 5; balanced macros; budget fit.
        • Sheet-Pan Chicken Mix – 80 – One tray; mild seasoning; no nuts.

      Insider trick: structure your text for better embeddings

      • Prepend a mini-schema so the embedding “knows” what matters. Example:“Audience: Busy parents; Need: 20-min healthy dinners; Context: Weeknights; Budget: $8–$15; Deal-Breakers: No nuts; Tone: Kid-friendly.”This often lifts relevance 5–15% versus free-form prose.
      • Do the same for products: “Category: Meal kit; Price: $12; Benefits: 15-min, one-pan; Exclusions: no nuts.”

      Common mistakes and easy fixes

      • Raw notes in, garbage out: Summarize into the card templates before embedding.
      • Cards too short/long: Aim for 50–120 words to capture enough signal without noise.
      • Forgetting constraints: Include price, availability, compatibility, allergens in the text.
      • One-and-done: Re-embed when your catalog or segments materially change.
      • Only similarity, no rules: Always add simple filters (price band, region, stock) post-similarity.

      Action plan (3 days)

      • Day 1: Draft 10 segment cards and 50 product cards using the prompts. Run the 5-minute quick ranking to sanity-check fit.
      • Day 2: Embed both tables, store vectors, compute cosine similarity, take top 20 per segment, apply filters, then rerank top 10 via the LLM prompt.
      • Day 3: Validate 100 matches, track hit-rate, refine card templates, and set a monthly re-embed cadence.

      Copy-paste prompt: end-to-end mapping

      “You are a product-to-segment matchmaker. Use the SEGMENT_CARD and PRODUCT_CARDS to select the top 5 products. Steps: (1) Respect Deal-Breakers and Budget first. (2) Maximize Need and Context fit. (3) Write reasons in ≤12 words. Output JSON array: [{product_id, name, score(0–100), reason}].

      SEGMENT_CARD: [paste structured 60–100 word card]

      PRODUCT_CARDS: [paste 10–30 products, each: id, name, price, tags, 2–3 sentence card]

      Return only the JSON.”

      Final reminder

      Start simple: clean texts, embed once, compare, then layer rules and reranking. You’ll get useful segment-to-product matches fast—and a clear path to keep improving.

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • BBP_LOGGED_OUT_NOTICE