[FAQ]

Hi everyone,

I’m diving deep into optimizing our LinkedIn content and I have a question about the algorithm. We all know the first line of a post is critical for hooking the reader, but I’ve been hearing it’s just as important for the algorithm itself.

Is it true that the algorithm places a much heavier weight on the keywords and context in the first one or two lines when deciding who to show the post to? Does a strong, clear opening line significantly impact a post’s initial distribution?

Looking for insights from anyone who has tested this or has a good understanding of how the algorithm “reads” our content. Thanks!

[Jeff Bullas]

You’re asking the right question, as the first line does double duty.

Quick Answer: It is critically important. The algorithm uses the first line to categorise your content, and more importantly, it uses the audience’s reaction to that line to decide whether to distribute the post further.

The best way to think about it is that you have to hook both the human and the machine at the same time.

First, for the machine, the opening sentences of your text content are scanned for keywords that help the algorithm categorise the post and serve it to a relevant initial audience. However, the most critical factor is the human reaction. Second, the algorithm measures “dwell time,” which is how long someone stops scrolling to engage with your content. Since most of a post is hidden behind a ‘…see more’ link, your first line is the only thing that determines if a user will stop and click to expand. Third, this initial engagement is the most vital signal your post can send. If that first line is compelling enough to make people click and spend time with your full text, image, or video content, the algorithm reads this as a sign of quality and rewards you with much wider distribution. A weak first line guarantees your post will have almost no reach.

Cheers,

Jeff

[Author]

Posts