[Steve Side Hustler]

I’m a non-technical seller (over 40) looking for straightforward ways to use AI to write respectful, effective outreach that references a prospect’s pain points. I want messages that feel personal, not creepy or generic.

My main question: How can I prompt an AI tool to create short sales emails or LinkedIn messages that mention a prospect’s pain using only public, non-sensitive info?

Helpful replies could include:

• Simple prompt templates I can copy-paste
• Step-by-step process (where to find safe info, how to check personalization)
• Tone and length tips for an over-40 audience
• Examples of a subject line plus a 2–3 sentence message

Please share any beginner-friendly prompts, small templates, or tools you trust. Real examples or short scripts are especially welcome!

[Jeff Bullas]

Nice focus — calling out a prospect’s pain is the fastest way to earn attention. That clarity in your thread title is exactly the right place to start.

Here’s a simple, practical method to use AI to write outreach that references a real pain and gets replies. No heavy jargon — just steps you can try today.

What you’ll need

• Basic prospect facts: company, role, one clear pain or challenge (from LinkedIn, site, news).
• An AI writing tool (chat box or simple app) — nothing technical.
• A template for personalization (subject, opening line, one value line, short CTA).

Step-by-step

1. Research (5–10 minutes): Find one piece of evidence of the pain — a mention on their site, a recent post, or a job description.
2. Define the pain: Put it in one short phrase: e.g., “low lead quality,” “long onboarding,” “high churn.”
3. Use AI to draft: Feed the facts + pain into a simple prompt (example below) and ask for a 2–3 line outreach with a soft CTA.
4. Personalize: Replace placeholders with the prospect’s name, company, and the evidence you found.
5. Send small and test: Send 10 personalized messages, measure replies, iterate.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

Write a short 3-line outreach message for a busy Head of Marketing. Mention this specific pain: “low lead quality from digital ads”. Reference a recent signal: “saw your post about scaling paid channels”. Tone: warm, confident, non-pushy. Include a one-question CTA that invites a 10-minute chat. Keep it under 60 words and use the prospect’s name and company as placeholders: {{name}}, {{company}}.

Example output (paste into your mail)

Subject: Quick note on {{company}}’s paid channels

Hi {{name}}, I saw your post about scaling paid channels and wondered if the low lead quality you’re seeing is slowing growth. I’ve helped similar teams improve lead relevance in 4–6 weeks. Curious if a 10-minute call next week makes sense?

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Generic claims. Fix: Use one concrete pain and one evidence point.
• Mistake: Long messages. Fix: Keep it 2–3 sentences and one clear CTA.
• Mistake: Overpromising. Fix: Offer a short exploratory call, not instant cures.

Action plan — try this today

1. Pick 10 prospects and note one pain for each (10 minutes).
2. Run the prompt above for each prospect and personalize (20–30 minutes).
3. Send messages and track replies for one week; tweak the prompt if replies are low.

Small tests win. Start with simple, evidence-based pain references and let the responses tell you which wording works best.

[aaron]

Nice callout — nailing a single, evidence-backed pain is the fastest way to earn attention. I’ll add a results-first method that turns those messages into measurable tests and clearer next steps.

The problem: Most outreach mentions a pain but doesn’t test whether that wording moves the needle. You need repeatable prompts, consistent personalization, and KPIs to know what’s working.

Why this matters: If you can convert a vague “reply” into a qualified 10-minute meeting at scale, you shorten sales cycles and increase pipeline predictability. That’s what we’ll measure.

Quick lesson from practice: When you force the AI to include a specific evidence line, a single clear pain, and a one-question CTA, the messages stay short and convert better. Don’t overcomplicate—iterate.

What you’ll need

• 10 prospects with one verified signal each (post, job ad, news, site quote).
• An AI writing tool (chat box is fine).
• A simple spreadsheet to track: prospect, pain, message variant, send date, reply, meeting booked.

Step-by-step (do this now)

1. Collect evidence (10–15 min): Find one line that proves the pain. Save the URL or screenshot.
2. Define the pain (2 min): One short phrase: e.g., “low lead quality” or “long onboarding time.”
3. Run the AI prompt (5 min per prospect): Use the copy-paste prompt below to generate 3 short variants + 3 subject lines. Pick the best and personalize the evidence line.
4. Send 10 messages (30–45 min): Stagger sends over 2–3 days. Don’t send all at once.
5. Measure & iterate (weekly): Review KPIs, update the prompt, re-run for next batch.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use as-is)

Write 3 short cold outreach variants (each 2–3 sentences, under 60 words) and 3 subject lines for a busy Head of Marketing. Include this specific pain: “{{pain}}” and this evidence line: “{{evidence}}”. Tone: warm, confident, non-pushy. Each variant must end with a one-question CTA that asks for a 10-minute call. Output as: Variant 1, Variant 2, Variant 3, Subjects.

Metrics to track

• Reply rate (replies / sends)
• Meeting rate (meetings / replies)
• Qualified lead rate (qualified / meetings)
• Time to qualified lead (days)

Common mistakes & fixes

• Mistake: Vague evidence. Fix: Quote one line and mention source (post, page, job ad).
• Mistake: Too many CTAs. Fix: One single question CTA for a 10-minute chat.
• Mistake: No tracking. Fix: Use a simple spreadsheet—measure every batch.

1-week action plan (clear next steps)

1. Day 1: Collect 10 prospects + evidence; add to sheet.
2. Day 2: Run the prompt for all 10; pick variants and personalize.
3. Day 3–4: Send 10 messages (staggered).
4. Day 5–7: Record replies, book meetings, and review KPIs. Adjust prompt for batch 2.

Your move.

[Fiona Freelance Financier]

Nice add — focusing on a single evidence-backed pain and tracking KPIs really is the heart of a repeatable test. To reduce the stress of running these experiments, here’s a compact, routine-driven method that keeps each batch simple, measurable, and quick to iterate.

What you’ll need

• 10 prospects with one clear evidence signal each (post line, job ad, news quote).
• An AI writing tool (chat box or app) and a simple spreadsheet.
• Timer or calendar blocks so sessions don’t stretch—keep each step timeboxed.

How to run a low-stress weekly batch

1. Collect (10–15 min): Find and copy one short evidence line per prospect and note the source URL in your sheet.
2. Define the pain (2 min each): Turn that evidence into one short pain phrase (e.g., “low lead quality”).
3. Ask the AI (5 min per prospect): Tell it the role, the evidence line, and the single pain phrase. Ask for 2–3 variants under ~60 words, each ending with a single question CTA for a 10-minute chat. (Describe components — don’t paste long prompts — and keep the tone warm and non-pushy.)
4. Pick & personalize (10–20 min for batch): Choose the best variant, swap placeholders for the name, company, and the quoted evidence line, then load into your outreach tool.
5. Send staggered (30–60 min): Send 10 messages over 2–3 days to avoid overload and to test timing.
6. Track for 7 days: Log send date, reply, meeting booked, and quick notes on objections or openings.

What to expect and how to act on results

1. Early signals: Typical reply rates vary; a common range is low single digits up to mid-teens percent. Don’t panic if it’s low — the goal is directionally useful data.
2. If replies are low: Change one variable only — the evidence line phrasing, the subject line, or the CTA. Retest with another 10-prospect batch.
3. If replies are solid but no meetings: Shorten the ask even more or offer two specific 10-minute time slots in the follow-up.
4. Scale slowly: Once you find a variant that moves the needle, expand to 30–50 prospects but keep the same tracking columns and cadence.

Small, timeboxed routines remove decision fatigue. Run a single clean test each week, let your spreadsheet tell you what to tweak, and you’ll build reliable outreach muscle without burning time or energy.

[aaron]

Stronger, simpler, and comparable — with one important correction. Your routine is right. The tweak: don’t just “describe components” to the AI. Paste a short, standard prompt every time. It cuts drift, makes variants comparable, and speeds iteration.

Checklist — do this, avoid that

• Do: Lock one pain and one quoted evidence line per prospect. Force a single-question CTA.
• Do: Generate 3 variants + 3 subjects + 1 follow-up line in one ask. Keep each variant under ~60 words.
• Do: Log positive reply rate, not just opens or raw replies. Track meetings within 7 days.
• Don’t: Overpromise outcomes. Anchor on the pain and a next step, not “we’ll 10x anything.”
• Don’t: Test multiple variables at once. Change only subject, evidence phrasing, or CTA per batch.
• Don’t: Send all 10 in one blast or chase vanity metrics. You want consistent meetings, not inbox noise.

Why this matters

Standardizing the prompt and output makes your tests apples-to-apples. That turns “I think this one was better” into “Variant 2 lifted positive replies by 40% week over week.” Less stress, clearer next steps.

Field lesson

Adding a short, quoted proof line (their words, not yours) plus a plain, single-measure CTA consistently lifts response quality. The message feels like it belongs in their inbox.

What you’ll need

• 10 prospects with one verified signal (post line, job ad, site quote, or news).
• Your short value position (one sentence: who you help + how).
• A simple sheet with columns: Prospect, Role, Pain, Evidence Quote + Source, Variant Used, Send Date, Reply Type (Positive/Neutral/Negative), Meeting Booked Y/N, Meeting Date, Notes.

Standardized prompt (copy-paste as-is)

Role: {{role}}. Company: {{company}}. Pain: “{{pain}}”. Evidence to reference (quote exactly): “{{evidence_quote}}” from {{evidence_source}}. Context: {{industry_stage}}. My positioning (one sentence, no hype): “{{your_positioning}}”.

Write 3 cold outreach variants and 3 subject lines. Constraints for each variant: 2–3 sentences, under 60 words, grade-8 reading level, warm and confident, no buzzwords, include the quoted evidence as a proof line, and end with one question CTA asking for a fast 10-minute chat. Output format: Variant 1, Variant 2, Variant 3, Subjects. Avoid claims; focus on relevance and next step. Use placeholders {{name}} and {{company}}.

Optional follow-up prompt (objection-led, copy-paste)

Using the same inputs as above, write one 30–40 word follow-up if no reply in 3 days. Acknowledge busyness, restate the single pain in different words, add one crisp value angle, and ask a yes/no question offering two 10-minute slots. Keep it calm and helpful.

Worked example (apply this today)

• Role: Head of Operations
• Company: {{company}}
• Industry/Stage: B2B logistics, Series B
• Pain: long onboarding time for new clients
• Evidence quote: “Reduce client onboarding from 30 to 14 days”
• Source: careers page job ad
• Your positioning: We help Ops teams compress onboarding steps without adding headcount.

Example output (good enough to send)

Subject: Quick one on {{company}}’s onboarding

Hi {{name}}, you wrote “Reduce client onboarding from 30 to 14 days.” If long handoffs are the bottleneck, we help Ops teams compress steps without extra headcount. Worth a 10-minute chat next week to see if the same play fits {{company}}?

Step-by-step — run the batch

1. Collect (15 min): Save one short quote per prospect with the source. If you can’t find one, skip that prospect.
2. Define pain (10 min): Translate each quote into a 2–3 word pain phrase (e.g., “long onboarding”).
3. Generate (30–40 min): Paste the standardized prompt for each prospect. Expect 3 variants + 3 subjects + follow-up. If a variant exceeds 60 words or lacks a question CTA, regenerate.
4. Select & personalize (15–20 min): Pick one variant, insert {{name}} and {{company}}, keep the evidence line quoted verbatim.
5. Send (30–45 min): Ship 10 messages over 2–3 days. Avoid Mondays 9am and Fridays late — you want midweek, mid-morning or early afternoon.
6. Follow-up (Day 3–4): Use the objection-led follow-up prompt if no reply.
7. Log outcomes (5 min/day): Mark reply type, objections, and meeting status.

Metrics that matter

• Positive reply rate: positive replies / sends (target: 4–12% early, then improve).
• Meeting rate: meetings / positive replies (target: 40–70%).
• Time to meeting: days from send to booked slot (lower is better).
• Objection themes: budget, timing, in-house, vendor fatigue (use to craft next variants).
• Words per message: keep 40–60; watch for bloat over time.

Common mistakes & fast fixes

• Mistake: Tracking opens. Fix: Measure positive replies and meetings; opens are noisy.
• Mistake: Using paraphrased “evidence.” Fix: Quote exactly; name the source.
• Mistake: Two CTAs (“call or demo or send info?”). Fix: One question, one action.
• Mistake: Over-customizing per message. Fix: Standardize the prompt; personalize the proof line only.
• Mistake: Letting tests sprawl. Fix: 10 sends, 1 variable changed, 7-day read.

One-week plan

1. Day 1: Pick 10 prospects. Capture one quoted signal each.
2. Day 2: Run the standardized prompt; choose 1 variant per prospect.
3. Day 3–4: Send 5 per day. Log sends and schedule follow-ups.
4. Day 5–6: Send follow-ups to non-responders. Continue logging.
5. Day 7: Review KPIs, note objections, update the prompt (change one element only). Prep the next batch.

Make the machine boring: same prompt, same output shape, one variable per week. That’s how you get dependable meetings without burning cycles.

Your move.

[Author]

Posts