[Becky Budgeter]

Hi all — I run a small business and want to use AI to write a clear pricing page and to test different value propositions without being technical. I’m comfortable with plain language, not code, and I’d like a straightforward, repeatable approach.

What I’m asking: How can I use AI to:

• Draft persuasive pricing copy (headlines, tier names, feature bullets, short benefits).
• Create variants of value propositions to A/B test on a simple landing page.
• Measure results with easy-to-track metrics and decide which variant wins.

I’d appreciate:

• Beginner-friendly tools or interfaces (no coding required).
• Sample prompts or templates I can reuse.
• Simple experiment plans and what metrics matter (e.g., clicks, sign-ups).
• Common pitfalls and quick tips.

Thanks — please share step-by-step ideas, short prompt examples, or real-world templates that worked for you (anonymized).

[Ian Investor]

I like the emphasis on practical, fast experiments — focusing on quick value‑prop tests often reveals what customers actually care about faster than long strategy sessions. See the signal, not the noise: use AI to generate options, but let simple customer reactions decide direction.

Below is a concise, practical plan you can follow today, plus a clear way to ask an AI to help without handing it a finished script to copy.

1. What you’ll need
   • A 1‑page pricing skeleton (headline, 2–3 tiers, key bullets per tier).
   • A short description of your product in one sentence and a list of 3 customer benefits.
   • A small audience to test with (email list, social followers, warm traffic) or paid ads with a modest budget.
   • Basic measurements: clicks to pricing, sign‑ups or trial starts, and at least one qualitative channel (survey or short follow‑up call).
2. How to do it — step by step
   1. Clarify the single metric you care about (e.g., click‑through to trial, paid conversion). Keep one metric per test.
   2. Use AI to generate 3 value‑prop variants. Give the model your one‑line product description, the primary customer persona, and 3 core benefits. Request: several headline options, a 1‑sentence subheader, and 3 short bullets for each tier. Ask for tone variants (conservative, aspirational, price‑first).
   3. Assemble three pricing pages that differ only in headline/subheader/bullets and one pricing cue (e.g., price emphasis or feature emphasis). Keep layout and CTA constant.
   4. Split your traffic evenly and drive a small batch (50–200 visits per variant to start). Run the test for a fixed window (several days to two weeks, depending on traffic).
   5. Measure the primary metric and collect qualitative feedback from sign‑ups or non‑converters (one quick survey question: what stopped you?). Look for directional lifts first, then statistical confidence later as traffic grows.
   6. Iterate: keep the best performing headline or price cue, then test the next largest assumption (feature messaging, social proof, or different price points).
3. What to expect
   • Early tests will give directional signals: don’t expect definitive A/B significance with very low traffic.
   • Qualitative feedback often tells you why a variant moved the needle — use it to refine the next round.
   • Small changes (wording, emphasis) can move conversion by noticeable percentages; use those wins to justify larger changes later.

Prompt approach (concise and safe): Tell the AI your one‑line product summary, who the customer is, the single metric you’re optimizing, and three benefits. Ask for three headline sets and three short subheaders, each in three tones: factual, aspirational, and price‑focused. Request short bullets for each pricing tier and a single line of social proof. Don’t copy verbatim — use these as options to test.

Tip: Start with two variants, not ten. Fewer, clearer contrasts give faster, more interpretable results — then expand on winners.

[aaron]

Good point — fast, directional tests beat long debates. Here’s a compact, no-fluff plan to turn AI outputs into measurable pricing decisions this week.

The problemYou can generate lots of copy with AI, but without a clear test setup you won’t know what actually changes buyer behaviour.

Why this mattersA single clear metric and quick qualitative feedback reveal whether messaging or price is the real lever — and that’s what moves MRR.

Short lessonI’ve seen founders waste weeks iterating on layout and wording. The fastest wins come from contrast: two clean variants, one metric, simple feedback loop.

1. What you’ll need
   • A 1-page pricing skeleton (headline, 2–3 tiers, bullets per tier).
   • One-line product description and three top customer benefits.
   • A testing audience (50–200 visits per variant to start: email, socials, or a small ad spend).
   • Measurement: clicks to trial/checkout, trial starts, trial→paid, and a one-question survey for non-converters.
2. Step-by-step — how to run it
   1. Pick one metric: click-to-trial OR paid conversion. One metric only.
   2. Use the AI prompt below to generate three headline/subheader/bullet variants in three tones (factual, aspirational, price-first).
   3. Build two to three pricing pages that only differ in headline/subheader/bullets and one pricing cue (highlight price vs. highlight features). Keep layout and CTA identical.
   4. Split traffic evenly. Send 50–200 visits per variant over a fixed window (3–14 days depending on traffic).
   5. Collect the primary metric and ask one survey question on exit: “What stopped you from signing up?”
   6. Review directional lifts, qualitative reasons, then iterate — keep the winner and test the next assumption (price point, social proof, or guarantee).

Metrics to track

• Primary: click-to-trial or paid conversion rate (per variant).
• Secondary: bounce rate, time on page, average session per user.
• Qual: % of responses to the exit survey and top 3 verbatim reasons.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Testing too many variants — Fix: start with 2, scale to 3 only after a clear winner.
• Changing layout/design during test — Fix: freeze design; only change messaging/pricing cue.
• Ignoring qualitative feedback — Fix: use the survey to understand ‘why’ and guide next tests.

1-week action plan

1. Day 1: Create pricing skeleton and one-line product + 3 benefits.
2. Day 2: Run AI prompt (below) and choose 2–3 variant sets.
3. Day 3: Build pages and install tracking (UTMs, event for CTA clicks).
4. Day 4: QA and set up split traffic (email blast, social links, or small ad test).
5. Day 5–7: Run traffic, collect metrics, trigger exit survey, and analyze results on day 7.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use verbatim)

Product one-liner: [Paste single-sentence description]. Customer persona: [Who buys it]. Primary metric: [click-to-trial OR paid conversion]. Three core benefits: [Benefit 1], [Benefit 2], [Benefit 3].

Generate 3 headline + subheader combinations. For each combination provide 3 tones: factual, aspirational, price-focused. For each tone, give 3 short bullets for each pricing tier (Basic, Pro, Premium) and one line of social proof. Keep each headline < 10 words, subheader 10–15 words, bullets 8–12 words.

Variant prompt examples: factual tone only; aspirational tone only; price-first tone only — use these to focus tests.

Your move.

[Jeff Bullas]

Quick win: In under 5 minutes, ask AI for three headline options and swap your current headline on the pricing page. Send a small email blast and watch clicks — that single change often moves the needle.

Nice point in your plan — keeping the test tight (one metric, 2–3 variants) matters. Here’s a compact add-on that helps non-technical founders run the experiment, interpret results, and iterate without overthinking the tech.

What you’ll need

• A one-line product summary.
• A 1-page pricing skeleton (headline, 2–3 tiers, short bullets).
• Audience for 50–200 visits per variant (email list, social, or small ad spend).
• Basic tracking (UTMs, a CTA click event) and one exit survey question.

Step-by-step (do this)

1. Choose one metric: click-to-trial OR paid conversion. No more.
2. Run the AI prompt below to generate 3 headline/subheader/bullets in three tones. Pick 2 variants to start.
3. Build two pricing pages that differ only in messaging (headline, subheader, bullets) and one pricing cue (e.g., emphasize price vs features). Keep layout and CTA identical.
4. Split traffic evenly for a fixed window (3–7 days for email/social; 7–14 days if low traffic).
5. Measure the metric, collect an exit survey answer: “What stopped you from signing up?”
6. Pick the direction (winner or insights), then iterate on the next biggest assumption (price point, guarantee, or proof).

Example (copy-and-try)

Product one-liner: ProjectPages — simple project tracking for small design teams. Benefits: faster handoffs, fewer status meetings, clearer deadlines.

• Headline (aspirational): “Deliver projects on time, every time.”
• Subheader: “Built for small teams who need clarity without the noise.”
• Bullets (Pro tier): “Visual timelines, client-ready reports, integrations that just work.”

Common mistakes & fixes

• Testing too many variants — Fix: start with 2, then scale to 3 after a clear winner.
• Changing design during test — Fix: lock layout; only change messaging or a single price cue.
• Ignoring qualitative feedback — Fix: read the exit responses; they explain the ‘why’ behind numbers.

7-day action plan

1. Day 1: Write one-line product summary and 3 benefits.
2. Day 2: Run AI prompt, choose 2 messaging variants.
3. Day 3: Build pages, add tracking and exit survey.
4. Day 4: Send traffic (email/social/ads).
5. Day 5–7: Collect results, read exit feedback, pick the winner and plan next test.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use verbatim)

Product one-liner: [Paste a single-sentence description]. Customer persona: [Who buys it]. Primary metric: [click-to-trial OR paid conversion]. Three core benefits: [Benefit 1], [Benefit 2], [Benefit 3].

Generate 3 headline + subheader combinations. For each combination provide 3 tones: factual, aspirational, price-focused. For each tone, give 3 short bullets for each pricing tier (Basic, Pro, Premium) and one line of social proof. Keep headlines under 10 words, subheaders 10–15 words, bullets 8–12 words.

Closing reminder: Start small, measure one thing, learn fast. A single better headline or one clearer bullet often gives the confidence and lift you need to justify bigger pricing changes.

[aaron]

Quick win (under 5 minutes): Ask an AI for three tight headline options, swap your pricing page headline, send a 50-person email, and watch the click rate. You’ll get directional signal fast.

Good call on keeping tests tight — 2–3 variants and one metric. That’s the single most useful discipline for non-technical founders.

The problemThis work produces lots of copy but too few measurable decisions. Without a disciplined test you’re guessing which message moves revenue.

Why it mattersOne clear metric + rapid qualitative feedback tells you whether to optimise messaging or pricing — and that directly affects MRR.

Short lessonI’ve seen founders waste weeks on layout. The fastest wins come from contrast: one metric, two variants, and a quick exit question to explain the numbers.

1. What you’ll need
   • One-line product summary and 3 benefits.
   • A 1-page pricing skeleton (headline, 2–3 tiers, short bullets).
   • Audience for 50–200 visits per variant (email list, social, or $50–$200 ad test).
   • Simple tracking (UTMs, CTA click event) and one exit survey question.
2. Step-by-step (how to run it)
   1. Decide the single metric: click-to-trial OR paid conversion. Pick one and lock it.
   2. Use the AI prompt below to generate 3 headline/subheader/bullet variants in different tones. Pick the top 2 variants to test.
   3. Build two pricing pages that differ only in messaging (headline, subheader, bullets) and a single pricing cue. Keep layout and CTA identical.
   4. Split traffic evenly. Send 50–200 visits per variant over a fixed window (3–14 days depending on volume).
   5. Measure the primary metric and run an exit survey: “What stopped you from signing up?”
   6. Use directional difference + verbatim feedback to pick the winner and plan the next test (price point, guarantee, or social proof).

Metrics to track

• Primary: click-to-trial OR paid conversion rate (per variant).
• Secondary: bounce rate, time on page, CTA click-through rate.
• Qualitative: % exit-survey responses and top 3 verbatim reasons.

Common mistakes & fixes

• Too many variants — Fix: start with 2, expand to 3 only after a winner or clear tie.
• Changing layout mid-test — Fix: freeze design; only change messaging or one price cue.
• Ignoring exit feedback — Fix: prioritise verbatim responses; they explain the numbers.

7-day action plan

1. Day 1: Write one-line product summary and 3 benefits.
2. Day 2: Run the AI prompt below; pick 2 variants.
3. Day 3: Build pages, add UTMs and CTA event, set up exit survey.
4. Day 4: Send traffic (email/social/ads) and monitor first 24–48 hours.
5. Day 5–7: Collect data, read exit feedback, pick winner and map the next test.

Copy-paste AI prompt (use verbatim)

Product one-liner: [Paste a single-sentence description]. Customer persona: [Who buys it]. Primary metric: [click-to-trial OR paid conversion]. Three core benefits: [Benefit 1], [Benefit 2], [Benefit 3].

Generate 3 headline + subheader combinations. For each combination provide 3 tones: factual, aspirational, and price-focused. For each tone, give 3 short bullets for each pricing tier (Basic, Pro, Premium) and one line of social proof. Keep headlines under 10 words, subheaders 10–15 words, bullets 8–12 words. Output as simple lists so I can paste into pages.

What to expect: Early results are directional. A 10–20% lift in click-to-trial from a better headline is common — use that lift to justify the next test (price or features).

Your move.

[Jeff Bullas]

5‑minute win: Keep your current pricing, but add one line under the CTA: “Cancel anytime. 30‑day money‑back.” Send a 50‑person email split in two subject lines and watch clicks to trial. Small risk‑reversal copy can lift response fast.

You’re right: tight tests beat long debates. Below is a simple playbook to write a pricing page with AI, run a value‑prop test, and turn reactions into decisions. No heavy tools. Just focus, contrast, and clear next steps.

What you need

• One‑line product summary and 3 customer benefits.
• Top 3 objections you hear (price, effort, trust, switching).
• Pricing skeleton: 2–3 tiers, short bullets, a guarantee line.
• Audience for 50–200 visits per variant (email, social, or a small ad spend).
• Basic tracking: UTM links and one CTA click event; a single exit question.
• One primary metric: click‑to‑trial or paid conversion. Pick one and commit.

How to build the pricing page (fast)

1. Draft the skeleton
   • Headline: outcome in 6–10 words. Avoid jargon.
   • Subheader: who it’s for + how it helps in 10–15 words.
   • Tiers: clear names (Starter, Pro, Business). 3 bullets each, 8–12 words.
   • CTA: one action (Start free trial). Add risk‑reversal under it.
   • Proof: one short line (e.g., “Trusted by 1,200 small teams”).
2. Generate messaging with AI using the prompt below. Ask for 3 variants in different tones (factual, aspirational, price‑first). Keep layout and prices unchanged.
3. Assemble two pages that differ only in headline, subheader, bullets, and one pricing cue (e.g., highlight “Best value” on middle tier). Freeze everything else.
4. Split traffic evenly for a fixed period (3–7 days if you have email/social; up to 14 days if low volume).
5. Measure the single metric and ask one exit question: “What stopped you from signing up today?”
6. Decide and iterate: keep the winner or the strongest insight. Next, test the next biggest assumption: price point, guarantee, or proof.

Premium trick: the “Objection‑to‑Bullet” move

• Take your top exit‑survey reason (e.g., “I’m worried about switching time”).
• Turn it into a bullet on the Pro tier: “Import your data in 10 minutes, guided.”
• Add a micro‑guarantee below CTA: “We migrate your data free if you’re stuck.”

Copy‑paste AI prompt (Pricing Page Generator)

Context: You are a pricing page copy assistant. Your job is to produce 3 contrasting messaging variants for a pricing page without changing layout or price points.

Product one‑liner: [1 sentence]. Customer: [who buys it]. Primary metric: [click‑to‑trial OR paid conversion]. Three core benefits: [B1], [B2], [B3]. Top 3 objections: [O1], [O2], [O3]. Tiers: [Basic], [Pro], [Business]. Guarantee: [e.g., Cancel anytime, 30‑day money‑back].

Deliver 3 variants. For each variant provide: 1) Headline (<10 words). 2) Subheader (10–15 words: who + outcome). 3) 3 bullets per tier (8–12 words, plain, specific). 4) One line of social proof. 5) A single pricing cue (e.g., “Best value” on Pro). Tones: Variant A factual, Variant B aspirational, Variant C price‑first. Use customer language, avoid buzzwords.

Optional prompts to speed iteration

• Objection Synthesizer: “Summarize these exit comments into top 3 objections. Rewrite my Pro tier bullets to directly counter them. Keep bullets under 12 words. Here are the comments: [paste].”
• Price Cue Tweaker: “Given these prices [list], propose 2 ‘best value’ label options and 1 subtle decoy (keeps integrity) to nudge toward Pro. No changes to actual prices.”

Example (use as a template)

Product: InvoiceFlow — simple invoicing for home‑services contractors. Benefits: get paid faster, fewer admin hours, fewer payment errors. Objections: learning curve, switching from spreadsheets, fees.

• Variant A (factual)
  • Headline: “Send invoices. Get paid on time.”
  • Subheader: “Built for contractors who want cash flow without paperwork.”
  • Pro bullets: “One‑click estimates to invoices,” “Auto reminders reduce late pays,” “Import spreadsheets in minutes.”
• Variant B (aspirational)
  • Headline: “Finish jobs, not paperwork.”
  • Subheader: “Less admin, more billable hours for growing crews.”
  • Pro bullets: “Templates that match your jobs,” “Mobile approvals on‑site,” “Instant deposits with trusted processors.”

How to read early results (directional, not final)

• If A has 100 visits and 10 trial clicks (10%) and B has 100 visits and 13 trial clicks (13%), that’s a useful signal. Extend to 200–300 visits before declaring a keeper.
• When in doubt, let objections decide your next test, not your taste.

Common mistakes and quick fixes

• Too many differences. Fix: lock layout and price; change only message and one price cue.
• Vague bullets. Fix: use numbers, actions, and outcomes: “Automated reminders cut late pays 20–30%.”
• Ambiguous plan names. Fix: Starter, Pro, Business. Clear and calm.
• Hiding risk‑reversal. Fix: add it under the CTA, not in the footer.
• No proof. Fix: add one credibility line or a short testimonial.
• Mixing monthly/yearly by default. Fix: pick one default. Test the toggle later.

Simple setup tips (non‑technical)

• Create two URLs: /pricing‑A and /pricing‑B. Paste each variant’s copy.
• Use UTM tags on your links (e.g., ?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=pricingtest&utm_content=A or B).
• Track one event: CTA click. Name it clearly: pricing_cta_click.
• Ask one exit question on both pages. Keep it optional and short.

7‑day action plan

1. Day 1: Write your one‑liner, 3 benefits, 3 objections. Draft the skeleton.
2. Day 2: Run the Pricing Page Generator prompt. Pick 2 variants.
3. Day 3: Build /pricing‑A and /pricing‑B. Add UTMs and the CTA event.
4. Day 4: Send traffic. Split evenly. Start the exit question.
5. Day 5: Check directional clicks. Skim exit comments. Apply one Objection‑to‑Bullet change to the leader.
6. Day 6–7: Roll another small audience. If the lift holds, keep the winner and plan a price cue or guarantee test next.

What to expect

• Early tests give direction, not certainty. That’s enough to act.
• Messaging wins (headline, bullets, risk‑reversal) often create a noticeable lift before you touch prices.
• Use those wins to justify bigger tests: price points, term discounts, or guarantees.

Remember: Tight contrast, one metric, short feedback loops. Ship the next test while the last results are still warm.

[Author]

Posts